Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've never heard of them before but Harper seems to think they exist. I've heard of "Old Stock Ale" but not "Old Stock Canadians". I guess I don't qualify because my ancestors came less than 300 years ago (probably barely over 200). What class of Canadian are you??

Posted (edited)

I can't wear my ball cap at the legion ..why can you wear your turban ..true north strong and free...what's ole stock to me..the generations that built there businesses here the sons and sons of sons who continue running them ,the loggers ...miners ..the ones who fund and donate to community's

Edited by North East Shark
Posted (edited)

I can't wear my ball cap at the legion ..why can you wear your turban .

 

Because a turban is not a cap, it's a religious symbol. Asking them to remove it would be no different than asking catholic veterans to remove a crucifix from around their neck. And those turbans were worn by soldiers in battle, who acquitted themselves admirably In both World Wars, fighting for your freedom.

Edited by Dave Bailey
Posted (edited)

Mr Harper just committed political suicide. (And almost every aboriginal wants him out big time)

 

Not that he cares, now he just moves into the corperate sector with an office and zero duties, but 6 zeros behind those duties

Edited by manitoubass2
Posted

Since I'm weighing in, I should get my bona fides on display. Born here in '53, to parents who emigrated from England. Ethnic background is English with a dash of Welsh.

 

Does that make me 'old stock'? Since Mr. Harper was probably using a dog whistle term for 'white European', I suspect he would include me. And thanks, but no thanks. I don't want to be included in his definition of Canadian.

Posted (edited)

Its political jargon and who really knows what he meant???

 

Was he referencing aboriginals? The settlers that built this country?

 

Is he calling all present canadians as property of the country???

 

Who knows?

Edited by manitoubass2
Posted

I can't see this as being good however please refrain from bashing or insulting comments and we will see where this goes.

 

 

Art

Posted

Since I'm weighing in, I should get my bona fides on display. Born here in '53, to parents who emigrated from England. Ethnic background is English with a dash of Welsh.

 

Does that make me 'old stock'? Since Mr. Harper was probably using a dog whistle term for 'white European', I suspect he would include me. And thanks, but no thanks. I don't want to be included in his definition of Canadian.

 

Similar ethnic background, and yes "thanks, but no thanks"

Posted

I am canadien . no more no less.. once again the playing of a country founded on immigration. the only true inhabitants were first nation. .hopefully the next goverments smarter then tha last pigs at the trough.

Posted (edited)

I believe Old Stock may refer to those old enough to remember The Canada that was before the majourity started to believe the multicultural , peacemaker etc. Krap that the liberal media and education system hammered into us since the sixties. I was born in 50 , the most influential people in my life were for the most part WW2 vets and believe me their values and influence on my youth were miles apart from the influences on todays youth, even the generation after me is totally different than me, you had these men as fathers, teachers, barbers etc.

Edited by dave524
Posted

Who was first, science is coming up with more indications there were others here long before those that claim the land.

 

Nobody is stopping those "others" to claim the land.

You have to exist to claim anything

Posted

"Old stock" refers to Canadians. The context of the comment was in reply to Mulcair and Trudeau insisting Canada must do more to help migrants from Syria by bringing them here, setting them up with housing, etc. Harper said he didn't think any new refugees coming in should be entitled to get anything from the government more than what Canadian citizens get.

 

He shot himself in the foot in how he phrased it, but the basic answer - saying everyone should be treated the same way - is something I support. Why should someone who has been in the country for five minutes be entitled to things I am not, when I have paid taxes here my whole life?

Posted

"Old stock" refers to Canadians. The context of the comment was in reply to Mulcair and Trudeau insisting Canada must do more to help migrants from Syria by bringing them here, setting them up with housing, etc. Harper said he didn't think any new refugees coming in should be entitled to get anything from the government more than what Canadian citizens get.

 

He shot himself in the foot in how he phrased it, but the basic answer - saying everyone should be treated the same way - is something I support. Why should someone who has been in the country for five minutes be entitled to things I am not, when I have paid taxes here my whole life?

....agree !!! 110 %

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recent Topics

    Popular Topics

    Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found

×
×
  • Create New...