Musky or Specks Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 I was reading down through this thread, hoping to see someone provide this response, and finally I did. Thanks Musky. I couldn't agree more. IMO, it's an odd attitude for people to have, thinking that if they can't use something, or that that "something" doesn't provide a direct benefit to them, then it's not of value. The place and purpose of any species on this planet, whether it's fish, plant, or animal, has so many more far-reaching and multi-faceted values than just whether it can tug on someone's line or wind up as someone's dinner, and it's a shame that so many are blind to that. It's that attitude that is a root cause of widespread habitat and species loss worldwide, whether it's Toronto and other urban centres chewing up thousands of acres of farmland to urban sprawl every year, or slashing and burning Brazilian rainforest to pump out beef for the McDonald's machine. If people fail to see the inherent value in the sheer existence of natural, wild ecosystems and the creatures that inhabit them, and they only see what can be provided directly to them for their benefit, then no wonder species decline and habitat loss are no big deal to most of the world's population, right? Big deal - it's just a swamp. Big deal - it's just some trees. Big deal, it's just some fish that I can't catch. The restoration, conservation, and protection of all organisms, for the plain purpose of ensuring their continued survival in this world, to continue providing all of the ecological and intangible roles and values they serve is something we should all strive to support. And yes - this is coming from someone who ate a 17" smallmouth bass for dinner tonight, caught by me fresh this afternoon. As John Muir wrote .... "When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe." This quote has often been incorrectly misquoted as the following more commonly referenced statement: "When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world." I actually find the latter usually resonates better with most people. Thanks, yes by all means eat species while there is plenty and protect it when its in danger.For me I'm not so much into raping the environment as I am into giving it a loving shag on the weekend and leaving it a nice note saying I'll give it a call sometime but never really intend to unless I'm drunk and can't find anyone else to go out with.
dhickey Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 (edited) Its not about pillage and plunder. Its about conserving a resource that is native to Ontario and that my friend is the goal of MNR . I back the MNR 100% simply because they at least try to find solutions to depleting native fish stocks. Stocking lakes with fish that are not native is a circle of failure. It can and does disrupted the ecology of a lake with repercussions that can be detrimental to a lake or river. Catch and release works!!! I just wish Ontario would adopt a trophy lake system.(0 fish kept) in more lakes and rivers/ not just sanctuaries. Don. Edited August 26, 2013 by saltydawg
mike rousseau Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 My question is WHY? Moneys spent on a fish we cant fish for or take for consumption. What the reason behind this? Why protect polar bears?
Stoty Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 Very short sighted opinion IMHO. Fish have a value outside of whether or not you can angle for them. They are part of a ecological chain that has existed for millions of years until we showed up and decimated their population with harvest and environmental degradation. You can't shoot peregrine falcons yet they "waste" money reintroducing them to downtown Toronto. Fisherman despite this boards egocentric opinion are not the only users of the environment. Knowing that sturgeon are there and part of a healthy balanced biology is all I need. EXACTLY!!! Typical ignorance of today's world though..people only care about something if it's for their own benefit.
Terry Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 Why protect polar bears? why why because they are cute and drink coke and smile , saw it on tv
MCTFisher9120 Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 (edited) I was reading down through this thread, hoping to see someone provide this response, and finally I did. Thanks Musky. I couldn't agree more. IMO, it's an odd attitude for people to have, thinking that if they can't use something, or that that "something" doesn't provide a direct benefit to them, then it's not of value. The place and purpose of any species on this planet, whether it's fish, plant, or animal, has so many more far-reaching and multi-faceted values than just whether it can tug on someone's line or wind up as someone's dinner, and it's a shame that so many are blind to that. It's that attitude that is a root cause of widespread habitat and species loss worldwide, whether it's Toronto and other urban centres chewing up thousands of acres of farmland to urban sprawl every year, or slashing and burning Brazilian rainforest to pump out beef for the McDonald's machine. If people fail to see the inherent value in the sheer existence of natural, wild ecosystems and the creatures that inhabit them, and they only see what can be provided directly to them for their benefit, then no wonder species decline and habitat loss are no big deal to most of the world's population, right? Big deal - it's just a swamp. Big deal - it's just some trees. Big deal, it's just some fish that I can't catch. The restoration, conservation, and protection of all organisms, for the plain purpose of ensuring their continued survival in this world, to continue providing all of the ecological and intangible roles and values they serve is something we should all strive to support. And yes - this is coming from someone who ate a 17" smallmouth bass for dinner tonight, caught by me fresh this afternoon. As John Muir wrote .... "When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe." This quote has often been incorrectly misquoted as the following more commonly referenced statement: "When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world." I actually find the latter usually resonates better with most people. Could of not said it better myself, sums it all up perfect...hope this all makes some real sense now to some fokes...On a side note lets see Scugog closed off to Ice Fishing for a few years...one thing is for sure that fishery had headed down hill one little white bucket at a time Edited August 26, 2013 by MikeTheBassFisher
porkpie Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 Glad to hear of some success in the program. I continue to hear of greater and greater numbers of Sturgeon entering the Notty. I remember a guy caught one near the mouth 25 years ago and at that time it was an EVENT! I support succesful reintroductions of native species. When it comes to throwing millions down the rabbit hole on an unsuccessful venture over a period of more than 20 years (cough.. atlantics.... cough) I agree they should switch gears and move the funds to a more succesful program.
BillM Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 I haven't had the luxury of being bumped into by one of these monsters yet while waist deep in the Notty, but I sure look forward to it
misfish Posted August 26, 2013 Author Report Posted August 26, 2013 I asked why and got my answers. As for being ignorant to it,I feel money should still be spent on the officers,then move on to other adventures. Thanks.
mercman Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 The river and joining lakes around Montreal are polluted with them. I have seen hundreds caught and photographed over the last year. Here we have a possession limit of 1 per year. I have seen them caught on walleye gear, catfish bait, crank baits and anything else.
manitoubass2 Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 Oily but good smoked. You can only eat abit before you'll be running for a washroom
mike rousseau Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 I wonder what they taste like ??? If smoked right its really good... The First Nations in my area put out set lines for them and sell smoked sturgeon..., I have a friend that is great at smoking... He has stopped me on the water to give me some.... And it never makes it back to shore... You can buy it at a few of the marinas on the reservation...,
northernpike56 Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 They are trying to re-establish a self-sustaining population so that one time in the future, they can maybe open up a season for them. Great endeavour if you ask me. ^ this.
Richie Razor Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 I was gonna say, I hear they're delicious but I feel bad boinking one that is 50 years old.
mistyriver1 Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 They are in there for sure. My son got one a couple of years a go on a jig and a worm. We were fishing for suckers.
davey buoy Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 Nice catch Love to accidently catch one if only for the fight.Watching too many fishing shows lol.
fishindevil Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 I'm glad that they are protected I have caught a few while walleye fishing the Ottawa river and we were asking almost 20yrs ago up in the Ottawa river district to have it closed and nobody listened the MNR In pembroke said they were considering it and did nothing for years !!!!! I saw them caught and left to die and treated like they were a garbage fish !!!!! I see a few and catch the odd one now and agin so I'm hoping they are protected for along time as its gonna take years to get the numbers back as they do not reach sexual maturity apparently till they are 20-25years old !!!!!! So it's gonna take some time no problem I can wait !!!!!! And yes they fight hard in the current with that big tail for sure.....
manitoubass2 Posted August 26, 2013 Report Posted August 26, 2013 Just down Down from my house I see catches quite often and some are comical to watch, pulling boats all around the river lol. They are so strong it's crazy! The big one I landed from shore took a little over an hour to get to shore. Caught it first cast and that was the end if my day lol. My shoulders and back just took a beating, as did my bass rod. I could feel the pressure right down to the reel seat. Incredible fish, I'd love to be able to catch and release one day
J-M Posted September 15, 2013 Report Posted September 15, 2013 Hi Misfish, I helped run the sturgeon program with the Nottawasaga Conservation Authority a few years back. Not sure where you're getting your information from but the MNR isn't currently stocking Lake Sturgeon in Georgian Bay/Huron. Currently, the NVCA/MNR are monitoring there presence, mapping their spawning habitat and improving riparian habitat which indirectly improves habitat for species such as salmon and trout in the Notty. SO, actually, the fact that sturgeon are protected means there is more government funding to help imrpove the habitat in the Nottawasaga which will also help salmon/trout. You need to understand the mandate of the MNR, its not about improving the populations of gamefish for anglers, its about bringing back native fish to their historic populations. Which I totally agree with....
glen Posted September 15, 2013 Report Posted September 15, 2013 That's great info thank you. Can they use my lic money (that I buy so I can catch fish) to improve fish stocks?
Dan668 Posted September 16, 2013 Report Posted September 16, 2013 Seen a nice sturgeon, id estimate ~40 lbs sitting in the shallows over by Bone island in gbay today. Was a pretty cool sight.
ch312 Posted September 16, 2013 Report Posted September 16, 2013 Nice catch Love to accidently catch one if only for the fight.Watching too many fishing shows lol. They sure get the heart going when you're fishing a small creek for trout and hook into one of these dinosaurs! From a Lake Eire trib last fall, about 4 ft long.
misfish Posted September 16, 2013 Author Report Posted September 16, 2013 Hi Misfish, I helped run the sturgeon program with the Nottawasaga Conservation Authority a few years back. Not sure where you're getting your information from but the MNR isn't currently stocking Lake Sturgeon in Georgian Bay/Huron. Currently, the NVCA/MNR are monitoring there presence, mapping their spawning habitat and improving riparian habitat which indirectly improves habitat for species such as salmon and trout in the Notty. SO, actually, the fact that sturgeon are protected means there is more government funding to help imrpove the habitat in the Nottawasaga which will also help salmon/trout. You need to understand the mandate of the MNR, its not about improving the populations of gamefish for anglers, its about bringing back native fish to their historic populations. Which I totally agree with.... Thank you for your reply. From what I took from the sign,(which is posted in Angus at the Notty) they were doing restoration and stocking . But maybe I read into it to much. Thanks again.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now