fishindevil Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 Please go to home page of Ontario out of doors and read the info saying native harvest is 3 times greater than angler harvest since 2005 and it's unregulated and the MNR agrees !!!!!!
BillM Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 They are surprised that gill nets take more then anglers? I thought that was normal.
fishindevil Posted April 15, 2013 Author Report Posted April 15, 2013 I didn't know how to get the link up ?? Just wanted to show other views on the matter can someone put the link up??
BillM Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 Wants Nipissing Gill Nets PulledBy: Steve Galea Urgulated commercial gill netting has virtually destroyed Lake Nipissing's walleye fishery and should be stopped, says the OFAH. The federation is basing its recommendation on results of an independent review of the fishery, commissioned by the MNR. It revealed few walleye 3 years or older in the lake, indicating big mature fish are facing unsustainable pressure. It also notes a clear difference between fishing mortality inf licted by recreational anglers and First Nation commercial gill netting, which has been three times greater than angler harvest since 2005. Anglers have complied with increasing restrictions, including shorter seasons, lower limits, and a slot size since 1999, in an effort to stabilize walleye populations. Even so, recreational harvests are at an all time low. In that same time frame, the Nipissing First Nation commercial fishery has never reported annual harvest data. The OFAH contends the province has ignored MNR biologists who said there was cause for grave concern and has failed to implement a much needed regulated commercial walleye regime. Wants Nipissing Gill Nets Pulled UNREGULATED commercial gill netting has virtually destroyed Lake Nipissing's walleye fishery and should be stopped, says the OFAH. The federation is basing its recommendation on results of an independent review of the fishery, commissioned by the MNR. It revealed few walleye 3 years or older in the lake, indicating big mature fish are facing unsustainable pressure. It also notes a clear difference between fishing mortality inf licted by recreational anglers and First Nation commercial gill netting, which has been three times greater than angler harvest since 2005. Anglers have complied with increasing restrictions, including shorter seasons, lower limits, and a slot size since 1999, in an effort to stabilize walleye populations. Even so, recreational harvests are at an all time low. In that same time frame, the Nipissing First Nation commercial fishery has never reported annual harvest data. The OFAH contends the province has ignored MNR biologists who said there was cause for grave concern and has failed to implement a much needed regulated commercial walleye regime. "Lake Nipissing, one of Ontario's specially designated waters, has seen its walleye fisheries virtually collapse," said OFAH Provincial Manager of Fish and Wildlife Services Dr. Terry Quinney. "The MNR has the authority and responsibility to manage our natural resources for the benefit of all Ontarians, and yet they have allowed overharvesting by commercial gill-net operations to continue unregulated for more than a decade. Until the provincial government suspends all commercial gill-net operations and implements enforceable regulations, their own data tells us that the Lake Nipissing walleye population will not begin to recover." "Lake Nipissing, one of Ontario's specially designated waters, has seen its walleye fisheries virtually collapse," said OFAH Provincial Manager of Fish and Wildlife Services Dr. Terry Quinney. "The MNR has the authority and responsibility to manage our natural resources for the benefit of all Ontarians, and yet they have allowed overharvesting by commercial gill-net operations to continue unregulated for more than a decade. Until the provincial government suspends all commercial gill-net operations and implements enforceable regulations, their own data tells us that the Lake Nipissing walleye population will not begin to recover."
Roy Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 The first word of the article destroyed any confidence I might have had in the validity of its content. I'll wait for V.2.0.
jimmer Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 So the OFAH wants the gill nets pulled. Most anglers and resort owners want this, but what is going to be done? Statements like this mean nothing, unless they plan on doing something.
outllaw Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 everyone wants a piece of the pie. i make a xmas wish list every year. as we well know goverments are lets just say fence-sitters.
blarg Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 So the OFAH wants the gill nets pulled. Most anglers and resort owners want this, but what is going to be done? Statements like this mean nothing, unless they plan on doing something. Nothing will be done, for several reasons, first those are magic gill nets, they don't have a great impact on the walleye or other species, second, all sport anglers are poachers so they keep way more fish than the nets catch, third, the lake belongs solely to nfn. In any case, i know that nfn knows best, and I am sure that while they continue to use only traditional methods and equipment they will ensure a future for thier lake and it's fishery.
solopaddler Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 Nothing will be done, for several reasons, first those are magic gill nets, they don't have a great impact on the walleye or other species, second, all sport anglers are poachers so they keep way more fish than the nets catch, third, the lake belongs solely to nfn. In any case, i know that nfn knows best, and I am sure that while they continue to use only traditional methods and equipment they will ensure a future for thier lake and it's fishery. Pretty sure that comment was tongue in cheek right? Anyhow I'm gladdened that FINALLY someone in some kind of official capacity has echoed my feelings on the matter.
jedimaster Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 Wouldn't it be a better solution if they just allowed members of the public to use gill nets for personal harvest instead of just allowing people to use one fishing rod? After all its the fisherman that are the problem.
irishfield Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 Definitely sad when you can't spell the first word correctly. The first word of the article destroyed any confidence I might have had in the validity of its content. I'll wait for V.2.0.
Headhunter Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 (edited) Don't worry too much about this guys... we can always fish Algonquin Park or Quinte! HH Edited April 15, 2013 by Headhunter
tb4me Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 (edited) Brutal..Im just happy that this is become public beyond what us anglers have to say..I stopped going to the nip Years ago for this very reason. Spend a TON of money to fish, maybe get 1 or 2 in the slot, after dropping 300 for a long weekend, all while watching those big boats haul it in by the ton.. Edited April 15, 2013 by tb4me
solopaddler Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 The first word of the article destroyed any confidence I might have had in the validity of its content. I'll wait for V.2.0. Definitely sad when you can't spell the first word correctly. Certainly not Steve Galeas fault. I've had all kinds of issues with editors in the past myself. Mistakes get made, it's no big deal.
limeyangler Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 Sesame Street was brought to you today by the word 'urgulate'.
lookinforwalleye Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 What urgulated is a word isn't it?
Oggie Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 It's hard to believe the First Nations would overharvest a resource. I was always taught they harvest in harmony with the spirit of the fish and the bear. The Spirit of Lake Nipissing would tell them when enough is enough. I'm disappointed that they're just like non-natives. Given the opportunity and with no conservation laws they hammer a resource just like everyone else. They didn't overharvested when they lived off of the land because they just didn't have the technology or the population numbers to pressure a resource. So much for my romantic view of First Nations. Dan O.
capt bruce Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 (edited) You would think that they had , for better than worse at least an editor that can spell . When speaking on matters of such importance to many you could at least take the time to SPELL CHECK ... But I guess when you print a thing that is pointed towards elected people , what does it matter most members of our goverment probaby cant read anyway ... Edited April 15, 2013 by capt bruce
Radnine Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 It's hard to believe the First Nations would overharvest a resource. I was always taught they harvest in harmony with the spirit of the fish and the bear. The Spirit of Lake Nipissing would tell them when enough is enough. I'm disappointed that they're just like non-natives. Given the opportunity and with no conservation laws they hammer a resource just like everyone else. They didn't overharvested when they lived off of the land because they just didn't have the technology or the population numbers to pressure a resource. So much for my romantic view of First Nations. Dan O. I am sorry that your vision of the people that fished lake Nipissing for 10,000 years before the first fishing regulation was ever written has taken a beating. But they are not "just like us non-natives" because they did not claim ownership of mother earth and parcel it up for capital gain. I am thankful every time I fish anywhere that we are granted the privilege. Jim
solopaddler Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 It's hard to believe the First Nations would overharvest a resource. I was always taught they harvest in harmony with the spirit of the fish and the bear. The Spirit of Lake Nipissing would tell them when enough is enough. I'm disappointed that they're just like non-natives. Now that's funny. Seriously.
esoxansteel Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 OFAH isnt that the same organization that would NOT support a 2 fish limit for steelhead in Lake Ontario (FMZ 20), when all OFAH zone areas were in support of the 2 fish limit. Thats what i call representing your members well
Muskieman Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 I do not support the OFAH whatsoever, nor do I support the commercial netting idea in my back yard. but FNs are not on a provincial level , heck they are darned near beyond the federal level, with that said, there is always a possibility of decommercialization (not a real word) but totally stopping netting of all kinds will never happen, traite rights are almost impossible to overturn. sorry . Randy
bigugli Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 We all know that government is not going to stand up and take off the kid gloves. Stop stocking the Nippissing and French, remove MNR supports and provincial subsidies for those fisheries, and let the NFN manage the fishery for a few years. They will learn to make it work or collapse. If they go to the province for help, it's negotiable. This approach has been taken before some years back
Rod Caster Posted April 15, 2013 Report Posted April 15, 2013 We all know that government is not going to stand up and take off the kid gloves. Stop stocking the Nippissing and French, remove MNR supports and provincial subsidies for those fisheries, and let the NFN manage the fishery for a few years. They will learn to make it work or collapse. If they go to the province for help, it's negotiable. This approach has been taken before some years back I like this idea...although I would hope for a better end result...but I say let them deal with the lake since there really is no other option anyway.
Joeytier Posted April 16, 2013 Report Posted April 16, 2013 Well the OFAH is officially a joke...and nipissing was pretty stellar this year for a 'collapsed' fishery. Articles like this are doing more harm to the local resorts than MNR regulation changes ever could.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now