grimsbylander Posted March 27, 2017 Report Posted March 27, 2017 I think a slash on the stick that breaks a stick is a penalty. A slash on the hands that causes an injury like Methots deserves a suspension. The penalty should fit the crime and each player should be accountable for their actions, intentional or not. If the league allows injuries from slashes like this then I would say it's open season on Crosby as well. Where would it stop? These guys have spent most of their lives in a rink playing hockey at a level most of us can't even begin to relate to, they know what they are doing. I've always given Sid the benefit of the doubt but this play should have been a suspension. When a guy pulls off his glove and his finger is missing, why does that not compare to a high sticking where a guy bleeds and loses a few teeth? You're right...it should have been a penalty. But not a suspension because Methot got injured. The league can't start handing out suspensions based on medical conditions. You've have guys out "injured" all the time trying to draw larger suspensions...especially in or near the playoffs. Now, Crosby is good, but there is no way he specifically targeted that injury. Even the guys on Hockey Central discussed that fact that some part of responsibility lays on the players to wear proper gear. As many of the pros do, Methots was wearing a very light glove which optimizes feel. That's on him. And the high sticking rules only makes a distiction between 2 and 4 minutes..not a suspension.
Acountdeleted Posted March 27, 2017 Report Posted March 27, 2017 You're right...it should have been a penalty. But not a suspension because Methot got injured. The league can't start handing out suspensions based on medical conditions. You've have guys out "injured" all the time trying to draw larger suspensions...especially in or near the playoffs. Now, Crosby is good, but there is no way he specifically targeted that injury. Even the guys on Hockey Central discussed that fact that some part of responsibility lays on the players to wear proper gear. As many of the pros do, Methots was wearing a very light glove which optimizes feel. That's on him. And the high sticking rules only makes a distiction between 2 and 4 minutes..not a suspension. I disagree on this. If a player gets injured due to a malicious act of another player, you get an NHL appointed doctor to look at him. However long the doctor says the player should take to recover, the attacker is suspended for that many games unless the player is medically cleared to return sooner.
misfish Posted March 27, 2017 Report Posted March 27, 2017 Maple Leafs Recall Kapanen and Sparks from Marlies
grimsbylander Posted March 27, 2017 Report Posted March 27, 2017 (edited) I disagree on this. If a player gets injured due to a malicious act of another player, you get an NHL appointed doctor to look at him. However long the doctor says the player should take to recover, the attacker is suspended for that many games unless the player is medically cleared to return sooner. You can disagree but if it was as simple as you make it out to be, the NHL would have done it years ago. Frankly, it makes zero sense to try to coordinate injuries with time served and whether it was intentional or accidental. Edited March 27, 2017 by grimsbylander
manitoubass2 Posted March 27, 2017 Report Posted March 27, 2017 I disagree on this. If a player gets injured due to a malicious act of another player, you get an NHL appointed doctor to look at him. However long the doctor says the player should take to recover, the attacker is suspended for that many games unless the player is medically cleared to return sooner. I disagree with both. It's Crosby, suspend him for 10 games just because lol. Next up, dyneema woven fibres in gloves.
mikeh Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 (edited) does the NHL even review the play since there was no penalty called? I think Crosby deserved a couple of games, although the slash didn't look too bad except for the outcome. The one rule I'd like the NHL to adopt is if you run into the goalie in the crease it should be a 5 minute major, they would think twice about running the goalie or falling on them , goalies are too valuable to teams and can't afford to lose them. Edited March 28, 2017 by mikeh
BillM Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 You can't suspend on the outcome, that makes no sense at all. If I crack a guy over the head with my stick but he's 100% fine and doesn't even miss a shift, do I get suspended? What happens if I merely tap him on the helmet and he has a concussion and is out for the season? Crosbys slash was something that happens probably 100 times during a game, **** happens these aren't ballet dancers that are out there skating around. Go get stitched up and get back on the ice.
jimmer Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 It was a fluke injury. He should have got a penalty, but being suspended for that would be ridiculous.
BillM Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 If you get caught slashing, 2mins in the box.
muskymatt Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 There is an automatic penalty already for high sticking. If the ref thinks you attempted to injure he can give a game misconduct and you would have a review. Possibly leading to a suspension. Many slashes go without a penalty but breaking the stick or hitting the hands is a penalty already as well. So if you slash someone with the force enough to remove a piece of finger then the ref should have the right to say you attempted to, or caused a significant injury and you get a game ejection, misconduct and a hearing. Whats so wrong with that? You can't suspend on the outcome, that makes no sense at all. If I crack a guy over the head with my stick but he's 100% fine and doesn't even miss a shift, do I get suspended? What happens if I merely tap him on the helmet and he has a concussion and is out for the season? Crosbys slash was something that happens probably 100 times during a game, **** happens these aren't ballet dancers that are out there skating around. Go get stitched up and get back on the ice.
grimsbylander Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 ^^^ Easy, sticks get snapped in two all the time with well over enough force to break a finger. So is it intent to injury when the stick gets sheared off but there's no injury? Nope, its a two min minor. Now, if the guy two hands him with a baseball swing, and it's been done, that gets called and you'll probably get either a phone interview or an in-person hearing. That is exactly what you're describing. Honestly, I've seen that slash on Methot half a dozen times and I'm still shocked it caused that much damage. It was hardly an vicious attack. Crosby should have got 2...that's it. I still say you can't cheat on equipment and blame someone else for an injury.
manitoubass2 Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 (edited) Im telling you guys right now, you'll see the demise of leather and dyneema fibre will be added to gloves and possible other equipment in the next year or two. I have socks made with dyneema and they protect your feet easily as much as shoes.you can step on a nail and it won't penetrate the skin Sawfiler socks lol Edited March 28, 2017 by manitoubass2
grimsbylander Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 Im telling you guys right now, you'll see the demise of leather and dyneema fibre will be added to gloves and possible other equipment in the next year or two. I have socks made with dyneema and they protect your feet easily as much as shoes.you can step on a nail and it won't penetrate the skin Sawfiler socks lol I didn't know they made dyneema in lace!!!
manitoubass2 Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 I didn't know they made dyneema in lace!!! Hahahahaha. The ultimate chastity belt
BillM Posted March 29, 2017 Report Posted March 29, 2017 Those last few seconds were nerve wracking lastnight! Keep it up boys!
jimmer Posted March 29, 2017 Report Posted March 29, 2017 They always like to make it interesting!! Back to the Crosby slash. I watched it again and it sure didn't seem like a hard enough slash to cause the damage that it did. I still believe a 2 minute penalty would have been sufficient.
DRIFTER_016 Posted March 29, 2017 Author Report Posted March 29, 2017 Yes, it should have been a 2 minute penalty, nothing more. It was just bad luck that he hit the joint in the glove where there is next to no protection. The joint opens up when gripping the stick making it a vulnerable spot. I believe they just need to call all of these hacks and the players should tone down on the hacking if they know that the slightest violation will land them in the sin bin.
jimmer Posted March 29, 2017 Report Posted March 29, 2017 I do believe that Crosby can be a dirty player (sneaky) at times though.
DRIFTER_016 Posted March 30, 2017 Author Report Posted March 30, 2017 LOL!!! http://www.bardown.com/owen-sound-attack-player-scores-a-beautiful-lacrosse-goal-while-killing-a-penalty-1.710000
John Bacon Posted March 31, 2017 Report Posted March 31, 2017 Big win tonight. Andersen didn't seem any worse for wear coming off his injury.
Acountdeleted Posted March 31, 2017 Report Posted March 31, 2017 That was another big 2 points. It wouldn't have to be but both Boston and Tampa won as well tonight. 36 goals for Matthews and 2 points behind the Sens.
manitoubass2 Posted March 31, 2017 Report Posted March 31, 2017 That was another big 2 points. It wouldn't have to be but both Boston and Tampa won as well tonight. 36 goals for Matthews and 2 points behind the Sens.And another record for marner???
chris.brock Posted March 31, 2017 Report Posted March 31, 2017 That was another big 2 points. It wouldn't have to be but both Boston and Tampa won as well tonight. 36 goals for Matthews and 2 points behind the Sens. Yes but Isles lost. Can't control that other stuff, just play hard and hope for the best.
tb4me Posted March 31, 2017 Report Posted March 31, 2017 We gotta catch the Sens and steal that home ice advantage..
Recommended Posts