mike rousseau Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 Saw this picture in a tackle shop.... Owner said the fish bottomed a 60lb scale so they measured it before they released it below the ice.... "He said" it measured 65 inches!!!! And I don't know about you guys but that's the biggest musky I've ever seen in a pic.... Don't know if its 65 inches.... But it's big....
Skipper D Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 I think i know the guy in the picture ... lol .
cram Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 Have never heard of a 65 inch musky, but that's a big one for sure.
Freshtrax Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 Thats a huge fish. I've only seen one bigger .
cram Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 Just imagine that coming up through the ice. What a catch.
Skud Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 That would look awesome on my wall! HUGE!!!
bare foot wader Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 georgian bay musky? big fish, how recent was it caught
Handlebarz Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 that thing is huge must have been fun through the ice. Im guessing they were targeting pike through the ice? I ask as I dont know anyone who brings boga grips to go ice fishing or was it caught in a state that has ice fishing for musky? very cool I would love to target big fish through the ice
davey buoy Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 Would be time to trade in my auger for a bigger one. lol. What a beast!!!!!!!!!!!!
captpierre Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 the second shot shows the width of the fish. my guess, low 50s in length
outllaw Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 big fish. musta had spuded a large hole lol.
Handlebarz Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 George we had to do that for lakers back in Sudbury days and its not easy with 3-4' ice
mike rousseau Posted November 18, 2012 Author Report Posted November 18, 2012 the second shot shows the width of the fish. my guess, low 50s in length I find the second pic shows its true size... If that fish were vertical it would be much shorter then that guy... Who knows... Fish stories.... It was an accidental catch that was released.... A replica was made.... And the target species was pike and walleye....
outllaw Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 mike. spudding 3-4 feet down would stroke me out now lol..ice is for drinks not to stand on unless ya play hockey
Gerritt Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 Would have made one hell of a chowder
Jigger Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 I cant even get one that big when theres no ice...
Crazy Ivan Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 I think he's holding it away from his body and reaching for the camera in both pics. Makes it look bigger than it really is.
Whitespinnerbait Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 Sure is one Freaking Huge Musky :w00t:
irishfield Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 A magnificant fish, no matter the length. Based on my 4 finger width.. it's a 56" fish.
SlowPoke Posted November 18, 2012 Report Posted November 18, 2012 Huge fish, very nice. I'm not sure I'd want to reach done that hole.
kickingfrog Posted November 19, 2012 Report Posted November 19, 2012 Huge fish, very nice. I'm not sure I'd want to reach done that hole. A hole is exactly what I would call that mouth. Beast.
Rizzo Posted November 20, 2012 Report Posted November 20, 2012 that fish is stupid big...I give the guy credit for being able to hold it away from his body too, that's a lot of weight at an arms length!
trevy727 Posted November 20, 2012 Report Posted November 20, 2012 The guy holding the fish looks like a giant to me. The fish is huge and he's not holding it out at arms length. The first picture looks like he's got his elbow jammed in his hip just to hold it up and the second looks like he's losing it. I wouldn't doubt that fish being over 60"
Moosebunk Posted November 20, 2012 Report Posted November 20, 2012 Four fingers is 56 inches Wayne. You're awesome BIG man. Solid muskie regardless the yardage of the thing.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now