aniceguy Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 (edited) Below is the information for a proposed regulatory change on Lake ontario ( fmz 20 ) for rainbow Trout, Its a great step into the future one that We at CRAA offer full support and your comments are more then welcome please forward comments to [email protected] Louis Milo Vice CHair CRAA Edited March 22, 2011 by aniceguy
SRT8 smoker craft Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 DO IT !!!!!!!!! How about Erie to I am SOOOOOOOO sick of seeing the slaughter board shots with 20-25 dead steelhead This is very good news
chessy Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 (edited) raise the salmon to 50 per guy and 1 rainbow. Edited March 22, 2011 by chessy
timmeh Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 Nice to hear. Is there a petition or something we can sign to support your cause?
BillM Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 Great news Lou!!!! I hate seeing those slaughter board pics posted up after a day out on the charter boats.
solopaddler Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 Great news. Hope they push it through.
TerryC Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 Looks like a good plan. Hope it goes ahead. Clarence
aniceguy Posted March 22, 2011 Author Report Posted March 22, 2011 Great news. Hope they push it through. Like anything if there are 10000000 that say great and 2 that say its a bad move you know what the decision will be
toca Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 Yeah Makes No Difference For Me So Far Ive Gotten 0 so go for it.
aniceguy Posted March 22, 2011 Author Report Posted March 22, 2011 Bill we wanted it to go to 1 across the board, and that would have made a huge difference, but 2 was a good first step, it gives a few years to analize if its the right move or a further reduction or slot needs to be done. Bring on those Chromers
asdve23rveavwa Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 It has had a positive impact on Lake Huron's steelhead fishery...I agree with Shawn, why not include Erie as well. Does anyone really need to keep more than two 6-12 lb bows? There are still plenty of salmon in Lake O, for those that are fishing in a charter, or trolling the big water...and wish to keep more fish.
wallacio Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 It's about time! I'd also love to see a change in the pervasive attitude of many Lake O trollers that you might as well keep them because they won't release anyway. Contrary to popular belief, they'll swim away just fine (even on the hottest summer days) if you pop them off the hook right away without bringing them into the boat, taking pictures etc.
chessy Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 with the new interaction guide of eating fish i doubt that people will want to eat the fish .
kerr Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 not sure why people would want to keep them anyway, lake O fish are not the greatest tasting or healthiest eating but to each his own. I hope this moves forward though and good luck niceguy
Ricky Bobby Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 Good to see you are still hammering the MNR Louis. Like you say, 1 is better, but 2 is a heckuva lot better than 5.
Ron Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 :clapping: This is terrific news to hear. I encourage everyone who fishes to send a reply to the above email addresses. It is nice to know what support you have when it comes to this type of discussion. Being on the advisory council for FMZ 17, we are starting discussions on cold water streams strategies. This will fall in nicely with my opinions and what I hope would be the general anglers opinions as well. Cheers, Ron...
steelie hunter Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 not sure why people would want to keep them anyway, lake O fish are not the greatest tasting or healthiest eating but to each his own. I hope this moves forward though and good luck niceguy I know eh.. I was at the Ganny last fall, just for one day, and if the fish was smaller then 7 lbs, it went back, 7-15 lbs and it stayed on the bank. I guess bigger tastes better down that way lol. Was a slaughter show.
icedude Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 you got my vote -hopefully this subject comes up for discussion@ the April 9th Lake Ontario Trout and Salmon Symposium in Port Credit Cheers Paul
Headhunter Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 Interesting to say the least... however I can't help but think that to some degree, this change will be a recipe for many floaters out in the blue water. I wonder what some of the Charter boat guys are thinking about this? HH
solopaddler Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 Interesting to say the least... however I can't help but think that to some degree, this change will be a recipe for many floaters out in the blue water. I wonder what some of the Charter boat guys are thinking about this? HH Maybe, maybe not. Bottom line is the fish has way more chance of survival in the lake than in an ice chest. Another factor, steelhead and salmon are targetted in different ways, and usually in different zones. An ethical charter captain will leave them alone once a limit is reached.
Hairpy Posted March 22, 2011 Report Posted March 22, 2011 "An ethical charter captain will leave them alone once a limit is reached" Unfortunatly Mike , this isn't always the case. Joseph
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now