super dave Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 I found a small lake that I would love to access with my kayak. By looking at the map, it seems the only way to access is by a small creek. I checked it out last weekend and before unpacking everything, I saw a sign staked right in the middle of the creek saying private property. I thought that waterways are accessible? Can someone correct me if I'm wrong? I wouldn't be getting out of my yak and stepping foot on the land or even the creek bed. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muskieman Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 You should be legal .... Call the MNR find out . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 Personally, if I saw a "private" sign somewhere, I just wouldn't go there. Not worth the worry and headache. Do you know how many hundreds of thousand square kilometers of water we have out there? I understand your questioning it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillM Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 People like to think they own water, 99% of the time they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiskywizard Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 People like to think they own water, 99% of the time they don't. I agree. You're right. Even though it's not common, there is the 1% of people who do own water/lakebed/riverbed. And unless we get to see the deed, we can't know for sure. I'd assume it really is private property and respect the no trespassing sign, untill I knew otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssminnow Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 It depends on the water way. Some are considered private some are not. The following link from the MNR will give you a pretty good idea what is involved. Although it won't necessarily answer the question about your particular stream. http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/stdprodconsume/groups/lr/@mnr/@crownland/documents/document/mnr_e000115.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
singingdog Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 It's extremly rare for a creek to be private property. You have to decide how badly you want to access that lake...if it's worth a possible showdown with somebody who obviously doesn't want folks in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue pickeral Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Kick the sign over and throw it away. Wait a couple of days. If the sign is put up again, stay out. Otherwise, go up the creek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiskywizard Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Kick the sign over and throw it away. Wait a couple of days. If the sign is put up again, stay out. Otherwise, go up the creek. Really? Hard to tell if this is meant to be a joke. Vandalizing their property before trespassing doesn't make other anglers look very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopheraaron Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 I think it's a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigger Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 If its navigable, youre probably good to go. That being said, id heed tje other posters warnings. Folk can be pretty unreasonable when it comes to what is perceived as owned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wkrp Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Buy the property and take the sign down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiskywizard Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 If its navigable, youre probably good to go. Based on the case law, and the MNR application of it in their rules, I don't think it would be considered navigable. It wouldn't satisfy point 4 below: 1. For purposes of determining navigability, the Ministry position will only be finalized after considering the issue of navigability from the perspective of both the date of inspection and the date of letters patent. The necessity to consider navigability from both perspectives arises because the courts have historically considered navigability at the date of the grant, but it is possible, but not certain that future decisions will reflect only the current situation 2. Navigability depends on "public utility". 3. Public utility means actual or potential commercial or recreational use, or other "socially beneficial activity". 4. Generally, the waterway should run from one point of public access to another point of public access. Buy the property and take the sign down. Best answer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuzza Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Either go knock on some doors and see if the owner will let you go in on your kayak or contact the MNR - first option is more likely to lead to a peaceful fishing trip (assuming you can woirk out whose property it is) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Caster Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Either go knock on some doors and see if the owner will let you go in on your kayak or contact the MNR - first option is more likely to lead to a peaceful fishing trip (assuming you can woirk out whose property it is) X2. Show up with a frozen bag of walleye and a big smile. Chances are, the property owner is keeping out butt-holes; if he sees you as a nice guy, you may get yourself a private lake to fish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super dave Posted July 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 An update: I contacted the MNR in attempts to see if they could help me determine if the Private Property signs are legit. They couldn't really help me out and stated that the navicable water act is federal jurisidiction so they refered me to them. Left a detailed message and I'm waiting for a reply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopheraaron Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 X2. Show up with a frozen bag of walleye and a big smile. Chances are, the property owner is keeping out butt-holes; if he sees you as a nice guy, you may get yourself a private lake to fish x2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenCanada Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Personally, I only take signs of those sort into consideration when going out fishing. I fish small headwater tributaries all the time and I pay heed to those that I feel are legitimate and within the confines of the law and don't pay heed to those that aren't. I might occasionally be wrong, but I don't let signs dictate the law when they are put up by individuals, only by the Government. Often signs are put up as deterrents to others to prevent people from using a piece of public property, such as the case with many beach front properties in Georgian Bay. People will do whatever they can get away with. Read the rules as you have and do what you feel is within the confines of the law. If there is an issue, explain your reasoning and if you're in the wrong, apologize. Simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Bailey Posted July 7, 2012 Report Share Posted July 7, 2012 Definition of navigable waterway directly from the Transport Canada web site: Navigable Water: any body of water capable of being navigated by floating vessels of any description for the purpose of transportation, commerce or recreation. This includes both inland and coastal waters. The final authority to determine the navigability of a waterway rests with the Minister of Transport or his/her designated representative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Likely, buddy who owns the property would call the cops, the cops would come, tell you you're doing nothing illegal, but ask you to leave anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushart Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 It's amazing how much hunting permission I've got in my life from landowners with land posted as no tresspassing I think it's right when said---sometimes the signs are put up because the general public does'nt have respect for someones private property and treat it like a garbage dump---then the signs go up I find a simple inquiry with your intentions spelled out goes a long way when asked in a friendly manner I remember years ago---fishing a stretch of the Grand River near Dunneville----an older guy comes up to us and informs us we were on his private property---we really did'nt see the sign Now kids today would likely tell this guy where to go----we apologized as we' did'nt know---we were reeling up our lines---he said---that's ok---we could stay and got future permission to fish there. Sooo.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
206 Posted July 8, 2012 Report Share Posted July 8, 2012 Looking to infiltrate Chalk Lake? let us know how you make out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super dave Posted July 9, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2012 There are two entries into this small lake. From Downstream but its much closer with very little current or upstream but its 3x the length and also have to factor the paddle back. I decided to do the upstream route as it seemed more likely I would not encounter any issues with land owners with this route. It was a long paddle in and an even longer paddle out with the current and wind. In the end, I made it to the lake and it was a total bust. About 3 feet deep, and strangely with no weed growth or fish. Oh well, it satisfied my curiousity. Now I can sleep at night. If you ever decide that you want to try out this small lake, don’t. http://maps.google.ca/maps?q=lindsay,+on&hl=en&ll=44.445669,-78.578596&spn=0.035969,0.098791&sll=43.672673,-79.400886&sspn=0.145766,0.395164&t=h&hnear=Lindsay,+Kawartha+Lakes+Division,+Ontario&z=14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopheraaron Posted July 9, 2012 Report Share Posted July 9, 2012 Link's off... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jer Posted July 9, 2012 Report Share Posted July 9, 2012 There are two entries into this small lake. From Downstream but its much closer with very little current or upstream but its 3x the length and also have to factor the paddle back. I decided to do the upstream route as it seemed more likely I would not encounter any issues with land owners with this route. It was a long paddle in and an even longer paddle out with the current and wind. In the end, I made it to the lake and it was a total bust. About 3 feet deep, and strangely with no weed growth or fish. Oh well, it satisfied my curiousity. Now I can sleep at night. If you ever decide that you want to try out this small lake, don’t. http://maps.google.ca/maps?q=lindsay,+on&hl=en&ll=44.445669,-78.578596&spn=0.035969,0.098791&sll=43.672673,-79.400886&sspn=0.145766,0.395164&t=h&hnear=Lindsay,+Kawartha+Lakes+Division,+Ontario&z=14 Thanks for the heads up. I've often wondered what may be in Emily Lake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now