-
Posts
1,938 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Events
Profiles
Forums
Store
Everything posted by LeXXington
-
My condolances to you and your family
-
Niagara on the Lake to require special fishing permits
LeXXington replied to bigfish1965's topic in General Discussion
The issue is 100' today, 1000' tommorow and 10,000 the day after. Always stand up when you can Thanks -
Great going Bill, More information the better,
-
Niagara on the Lake to require special fishing permits
LeXXington replied to bigfish1965's topic in General Discussion
Hi Rick: The responce the city of Toronto has had to this has been the province only provides some funding local tax payers provide the rest. So for example you pay road tax, gas tax, and licence fee but this only covers some of the roads the local tax payer picks up the rest. So if you want too stand on town land the local tax payer, pays to keep it clean, cut the grass and the insurance incase you get hurt. So an none local person should pay for the privlidge of standing there, The major issue I see with this is if every town decided to do this there would be road tolls every 2k, if you wanted to stop and get out of your car buy a pass.. So much for come visit my town... Trust me this will not be the first or last time a city, province or goverment tries to take more money from you. If this gets past what I would recommend is Every person from St Catherines pays a standing fee to fish anywhere else in the province. (sorry local people) Darn I hate tax time it gets me all ticked off -
Niagara on the Lake to require special fishing permits
LeXXington replied to bigfish1965's topic in General Discussion
Yeap, Towns looking to get in on the $$.. Unforatunatly the Goverment did provide the powers to cities to tax. For example they may not be allowed to charge a "Fishing licence" but they could charge a access right to fish while standing on town land?. For example they do this if you want to hold a wedding or something on town land?? Hopefully the goveremnt will nip this in the butt as this will make lots of people who fish from shore locked out of many good urban fishing spots. Us with boats can pull right up and fish without interferance. I am sure the OFAH will be on this as we know without a large push the MNR will fold under presure. -
Hi All: When the last post came up about this, I became courious as many people have different views and arguments for and against. I therefore contacted the DFO and the Coast Guard for some guidance. Please do not treat this as Set in Stone as each situation could be different, Check with your local Harbour Master or coast Guard as there are special "Proclomations" Below is our e-mail conversation. There is still some area's that have special situations but it might give you some good information. I have removed the e-mails so they do not get flooded with "what if's" but please feel free to access this resourse that your pay for. Good morning Sir: please note, in blue, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans' response to your query. B. Sue Pêches et Océans Canada, 200 rue Kent, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0E6 Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 200 Kent Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0E6 Gouvernement du Canada/Government of Canada -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: February 15, 2007 1:25 PM Subject: Re: FW: Who Owns the Water? Thank you for your prompt reply. After reading the Navigable Waters Protection Act (Transport Canada) I would like your input on an agreeable understanding. To understand our issue, property owners are adding docks then natural and man-made harbours are springing up around them. Area's that use to be excellent fishing area's have had the land surrounding them sold by municipalities for development then the owners of these area's are trying to "Ban" people in boats from fishing in these area's saying they bought the rights from the Municipality. This is access from a boat only never touching the shore, land or property as I understand that this can be sold. 1. All water that is navigationally is open to the Canadian public, this includes harbours that have not had special powers granted too them by the federal government such as port authority established under the Canada Marine Act Right. 2. Where as the water is said to be off limits or by special proclamation by the government. Notices are too posted with the government of Canada or Fisheries. An Example "No fishing" fishing sanctuary by the Ontario government. Right although there could be some nuances to be made. 3. Local citizens can post "No fishing" signs but unless its endorsed by the Ontario or Federal government or a Authority established under the Canadian Marine act this can be considered a request not a law. Not exactly. It really depends on the specific situation. There are situations where there is no need for the government to endorse it. Thanks in advice you can provide. Paul " Brenda" < wrote: Good morning Sir: No one owns water. It is for the benefit of everyone. But someone could own the bed or the shore - and of course a wharf. There is a public right to navigate on navigable waterways. As per the Constitution Act, only the Parliament could interfere with this right. This means no one could do anything to stop you from navigating even if they own the bed of the waterway. This being said, the right to navigate does not give someone the right to use someone else property. One needs to distinguish between "access" and "navigation". Although there is a public right to navigate, if a waterway such as a lake is surrounded by private properties, there is no right to access the lake. Also, if the shore, a wharf or any other facility is privately own, it is perfectly legal to control use of those facilities. Owners of those facilities are not supposed to interfere substantially with navigation though. Navigable Waters Protection Act (Transport Canada) might be applicable in some cases. Legislation of fisheries is also with the federal but there is a link with private property. So depending on the circumstances of the case, it might be legal for an individual to indicate "no fishing". Again there is a distinction to be made between legislative jurisdiction and property rights. You may wish to refer to "La FOREST, G.V., Water law in Canada – The Atlantic Provinces, Ottawa, Information Canada, 1973 for more information. I trust this helps. B. Sue Pêches et Océans Canada, 200 rue Kent, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0E6 Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 200 Kent Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0E6 Gouvernement du Canada/Government of Canada -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Sent: February 12, 2007 11:12 AM To: XNCR, Min Subject: Who Owns the Water? Dear Sir/Madam. A Ontario fishing internet board that I read is currently having a lively discussion on a very important topic and we would like some guidance. http://www.ofncommunity.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=3302 We understand that if the water is navigational its "everyone's". The issue we have is with "private" Marina's. In this there are 2 types of Marinas The ones that are in natural harbours that a business puts a dock up and say its private "NO FISHING" via bringing your boat in (not touching shore). Then there are the type that are built, a channel is dug to the main lake and a harbour is dug out of the land to create a marina. There is concern of citizens taking a resource for all and calling it private with many on the municipal level confused as what is and is not true. Thanks in advance
-
Hey All: It was great too meet everyone there and hope to meet up with all of you next week Yeap, when I travel I take the herd with me.,, funny thing is I said the fishing show, my wife said hey we are coming too.. Said Ice fishing she tells me when are you leaving... Guess she worries about me coming home with a new boat. See you all next week
-
Bump... Good beer on tap.. I am going to try and make it depending on my herd keeping up.
-
I take my air bag withme all the time when kayaking.. Sorry Dear Yes, Dear I will be quiet now, No Dear. Right Dear
-
What you can download stuff from the internet without paying for it...???? What a shame, I fully enjoy going to the movies and paying $12.00 to see a movie,
-
Very Glad to here
-
I wanted to stay at home too but with my Wife and kid home I figured Work was a quieter place to go and read OFC
-
LOL, don't knock it the more that stay home the better the drive for the rest of us.
-
I hate getting carded,,, Drivers licence, insureace, ownership please
-
Well done, glad someone is doing great on Simcoe. Next time I am following you
-
If you check the log book you will see my name is NOT listed,. so it was not me
-
Dolt better head home too a faster internet connection ... LOL
-
Goddo and was first released in 1977 Thanks Lexx
-
Too add fodder to the arguments here, On Native land (water rights) You can travers the water, enjoy it for recreational use but. They own the water for fishing and hunting rights. I can't seem to find the offical notices but marina's and harbours that are man-made such as dug out might be considered different than ones that are made in the lake. Thanks
-
RRSPs - Are You Contributing This Year (NF)
LeXXington replied to bigbuck's topic in General Discussion
To ask is fine, to reply is choice? Anyone that can save for there retirement should. If you think the goverment will cover your fishing bill over 65 its a big wish. Save all year round to balance out savings.. Use the power of compound intrest and never give someone your money without doing your homework first. For the cost of 2 beer's a week is enough to save.. -
It was a jumbo perch that did it Super post
-
Perfect more for the Fishing for Tyler outing.. Thanks for posting
-
What I would do, Is check to see if insurance covers it all and if not sue the pants of the Parents of the people charged.. Mind you wait till they get convicted and sent too the resort.
-
LOL too funny Ray.. been there done that, Bought a 3 year conv licence then reliased that if I wanted more than 2 walleye I needed to get a sport licence so each year I paid again to get the sports. Then was told it was a no-no to have more than one licence. Fine how much to upgrade sorry you can't.. Mine is in the old wallet too. along with the boaters card, the Radio licence and the $$ for minows
-
Thats terrible. Their Loss. Happened too me too but I quit cause my "Boss" was taking credit for everything I was doing. 4 Months after I left the enitre Managment chain above me was fired casue when you take the person that knows the most, does the most, and works the hardest out.. The pack of cards does fall. More opportunities just opened up for you!!!