Jump to content

Do hooks dissolve in fish's mouth?


goteeboy

Recommended Posts

I was at Little Lake (Barrie) yesterday going after the lake's ubiquitous hammer handle pike. So i got into one and as it neared the boat i thought it was a decent size, until it got closer and i saw that it was incredibly emaciated (huge head, skinny body). Once it was landed, i saw that it had a bass-size spinner bait lodged in its throat. Looking at the location of the lure, it most definitely snapped off right at the knot. I removed my lure (a jig spinner w/ grub) and then I began what I was called to do for my whole life, minor surgery on an emaciated pike (haha). The hook was lodged near one of it's gill rakers, so i pulled the hook through, clipped off the barb and pulled the lure out, (which is still in the back of my boat) and then released the fish. Hopefully this fish will eat again and live to a ripe old age.

 

So a couple of thoughts related to this incident. Break-offs will happen but perhaps some precautions can be made.

 

1. When targeting pike or other toothy critters, you should use a leader. Not only do you save your lure, but you also can save the fish in the case of a break off. Also make sure you tie good knots and check your line for frays and retie when needed.

 

2. Do hooks dissolve? Put it this way, I'm convinced this pike would've starved to death before the hook would have dissolved. (I'm assumming that at longest this lure was in its mouth since opening day in mid May.) In this case, the spinnerbait hook had a silver coating and had just begun to rust, not to mention that the rest of the wire, weighted head, and skirt, were all pretty much intact and looked practically new. Possible suggestions: use uncoated or thinwire hooks?

 

Well, that's my conservational input for the day. I'll wait for the rest of you to chime in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is where hooks made of stainless steel and corrosion resistant alloys are a bad thing. In fresh water, i think the idea that they fall out after a few days is way off the mark. In saltwater, lures don't last very long at all, i have boxes of garbage lures that are no good from a season of use in salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good on you gotee for tending to that pike! Hopefully it has a chance now.

 

I agree with others here....by the time a hook like that had a chance to rust out, it would likely be too late....the condition you found that pike in supports that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think this is a great post........even though we may never get a studied answer to the question from this thread.

I certainly dont have the answer thats for sure. I do know ive always been taught to snip and let the hook "rust out' if a fish has taken it deep, or at least deep enough that a pair of hemostats and hook removal is going to kill the fish for sure. . Ya either play that hand, or just harvest teh fish as it is a hopeless thought sometimes to think the fish will survive. And just make sure that the fish doesnt go to waste if you know it wont make it. I dunno, im not a doctor or veterinarian so its hard to know what the right call is sometimes. Its gotta take a heckuva long time for a hook to degrade...........i would think a rusty hook in the flesh would probably not do well for the fish either. EIther way, im all for what is best for the fish if im not keeping that day.........whcich i rarely am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Years ago I was Carp fishing and hooked a small Perch. Once I got it in, I noticed there was some mono sticking out of it's bottom... ever the curious one and half expecting it to be like the draw string on a kids toy, I gave 'er a yank... and slowly I pulled a half rusted hook out the Perches' rear end!

No idea how long it was in there, but the Perch seemed ok and there was nothing else lodged in it's mouth, that I can recall... I think I'm wit the rest here and suggest that the probably don't rust out, most of the time... unless it's a PERCH! :whistling:

HH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have run across a couple of very emaciated fish too. One was a very long pike who should have weighed about 20 lbs but was about 7 lbs. I caught him on a jig. There was a clip from a fishing chain punched through upper and lower jaw. This was on the upper Ottawa River during the pike and walleye opener in may so this fish had this clip in his face since the previous season. He still managed to have enough of an opening to grab my jig. I removed the clip and released the fish.

 

Since I often use 2 lb test mono and baited hook for brook trout, I usually retie my hook after every fish....especially when it's a brookie over 16 inches long. Most of the time, I just cut the line and put the brookie in a large metal mesh bag hanging in the water beside my canoe and then retrieve my hook when I get home. This way, the trout stays lively all day in the bag. I usually find the hook quite far in the stomach even though I could see the hook in the trout's gullet after I have caught it. Surely the hook does travel to the stomach. The red finish on the red Gamakatsu hooks really takes a beating from spending a few hours in the fish's stomach. I'm sure that the further away from the stomach the hook does not dissolve as quickly. I often check stomach contents when cleaning fish and I've very rarely ever run across any hooks or lures in the stomachs of fish unless it was a fish that I or somebody had hooked and lost due to a break off a bit earlier in the day.

 

Since I have run across recently hooked fish and yet have never encountered an old deeply embedded hook there can be only 2 conclusions. Either the hooks do rust away quickly or the fish eventually dies. But, if an embedded hook is so fatal, why do I often run across fish that had been submitted to quite a bit of damage and yet have healed and lived to bite again? I even caught a trout whose whole upper jaw was missing....right up to between his eyes. Everything had healed up, the lower jaw was bent up until it almost ended up between the fish's eyes and the eyes were bulging outward.

 

I'm sure that someday, a future biologist will make his thesis on this subject.

Edited by Dabluz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always heard that hooks will fall out on their own, but obviously that's not always the case. Good job on saving the fish (hopefully)

 

But one point I'd like to make about fish not eating when they have a hook in their mouth. Clearly since you caught this fish, it certainly was trying to feed and likely had been doing so since it was hooked. Whether or not it was actually able to eat anything because of the lure stuck in it's mouth is another question that we'll never really know. I've caught fish before with hooks in them, so clearly it doesn't always stop a fish from feeding. However I do agree that taking precautions such as using leaders and strong knots are beneficial for both fish and fisherman.

 

I guess I'll continue to release fish with hooks deep in them. I don't really like doing this, but if I'm not going to keep the fish, I'd rather give it a chance to survive. Just my 2 cents. Interesting topic.

 

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always heard that hooks will fall out on their own, but obviously that's not always the case. Good job on saving the fish (hopefully)

 

But one point I'd like to make about fish not eating when they have a hook in their mouth. Clearly since you caught this fish, it certainly was trying to feed and likely had been doing so since it was hooked. Whether or not it was actually able to eat anything because of the lure stuck in it's mouth is another question that we'll never really know. I've caught fish before with hooks in them, so clearly it doesn't always stop a fish from feeding. However I do agree that taking precautions such as using leaders and strong knots are beneficial for both fish and fisherman.

 

I guess I'll continue to release fish with hooks deep in them. I don't really like doing this, but if I'm not going to keep the fish, I'd rather give it a chance to survive. Just my 2 cents. Interesting topic.

 

those were my thoughts exactly....if i know i will do damage to a fish that i am intending to release, i cut the line as close as i can and hope for the best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Minnisota DNR page

 

Ask the DNR

Q. In its statements on catch-and-release, the DNR says it's better to leave a deeply im-bedded hook in a fish's mouth and cut the line than to rip the hook out. The hook will supposedly dissolve. But how do biologists know this? en

 

A. There is no existing scientific research on the topic, but DNR fisheries biologists have observed fish surviving with hooks in various stages of "being dissolved" in their bodies. And many anglers have caught fish with a partially dissolved hook in its gut.

 

Many variables determine how fast the hook will dissolve, and if the fish will survive at all. These include hook location (throat, stomach, mouth, etc.), hook size, fish size, temperature (most reactions occur faster at higher temperatures, so a hook would probably dissolve faster in the summer than in the winter). A hook in the mouth may dissolve, but it could also work loose and fall out. A hook in the mouth might hamper feeding behavior, but only temporarily.

 

A hook in the gill, however, will almost always prove fatal because it interrupts the respiratory process before it gets a chance to dissolve. Hooks in the stomach will nearly always dissolve, if internal organs have not received life-threatening damage from the hook (such as during a fight between fish and angler).

 

How long does it take for a hook to dissolve? Again there are lots of variables, such as hook size and fish size. DNR fisheries biologists estimate that it would take roughly two to three weeks for an ?average? hook to be dissolved by the ?average? fish?without too much indigestion.

 

I often will kill a fish because it is gut hooked and bleeding. Stainless steel hooks of coarse will not rust out. Of coarse any fish deep hooked that is kept has no chance for survival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a kid I remember being told or many occasions that hooks left in fish would rust out. In later years I realized that in most instances this simply wasn't true and that people are told this so that they stop worrying about if they just killed a fish or not. Tell an upset kid that the fish they just caught with the hook lodged in its stomach will rust and fall out and watch how soon that kid forgets about the suffering of the fish and just buys into the story that the fish will lose the hook on its own in the near future and be just fine.

 

A few years back I read a good article in a magazine, perhaps Esox Angler, on this subject. I believe the author was a taxidermist and had worked on multiple large pike/muskie with old hooks still in them. He showed pictures of the stomach contents of a few of these huge fish and some of them had multiple lengths of line with rusty hooks in their stomachs. In the end the fish weren't killed by the mono and rusty hooks but its kind of disturbing that fish are living on in this certainly unpleasant way. I recall that the line and hooks in these fish were definitely worn and the hooks were rusty but they were no where near dissolving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recent Topics

    Popular Topics

    Upcoming Events


×
×
  • Create New...