LefroyFisherman Posted October 8, 2010 Report Posted October 8, 2010 I was just wondering if any of you guys have a 1999-2005 Chevy S-10 or Gmc Sonoma ZR2 4X4 with the 4.3 Vortec. Reason why I ask if because I have a 1998 Gmc Sierra 5.0 Liter 2 wheel drive, I commute to Toronto everyday and I work all around the GTA as an installer. Just wondered what you guys are getting for gas mileage? I've heard the 4.3 Vortec's are pretty hard on gas, I get 650km's or so on a 95 liter tank all highway. I would like a 4x4 soon since I moved up here in the spring. Thanks
Stoty Posted October 8, 2010 Report Posted October 8, 2010 I had a '99 Chevy Xtreme, which is the same truck. It didnt have the 4x4 package though. It cost $60 to fill it, and I was getting between 500-550km per tank. Hope that helps....
Billy Bob Posted October 8, 2010 Report Posted October 8, 2010 I had a GMC Safari Van with the 4.3 L engine......good strong engine for towing but not that good on gas even when not towing.... Bob
LefroyFisherman Posted October 8, 2010 Author Report Posted October 8, 2010 yeah, I've heard that the mileage isint all that great, maybe the same or a little better then what I am getting now
Gerritt Posted October 8, 2010 Report Posted October 8, 2010 (edited) just get a 4.6 v8 ford and be done with it! great mileage! Edited October 8, 2010 by Gerritt
misfish Posted October 8, 2010 Report Posted October 8, 2010 just get a 4.6 v8 ford and be done with it! great mileage! Yep what he said. I have the 4.2 6 cyl manual, and get the same if not more, as when new.They dont make the 4.2 now in the full size.
zeeter Posted October 9, 2010 Report Posted October 9, 2010 Have a 94 S10 4x4 with the 4.3. Love the truck (going strong at 372!), but not great on gas. Colorado or Canyon worth looking at?
LefroyFisherman Posted October 9, 2010 Author Report Posted October 9, 2010 Have 330000 on mine now, the Colorado and Kanyons aren't cheap enough yet
John Bacon Posted October 9, 2010 Report Posted October 9, 2010 I have a 2005 GMC Jimmy with the the same engine. Actually I think the front half of the truck is pretty much the same as an S10. I don't know exactly how much mileage I get but I know it sucks.
BillM Posted October 9, 2010 Report Posted October 9, 2010 (edited) I drive a '03 S10 ZR2. With stock tires I was pulling 20mpg tanks on the highway pretty regularly.. But after the lift and new tires, I'm seeing about 14mpg on average, lol. I get about the same mileage as my oldmans '07 2500HD Duramax.. In short, these trucks suck for mileage... Engines are pretty much bulletproof, except for the intake manifold gasket issues some earlier engines had. My truck. Edited October 9, 2010 by BillM
LefroyFisherman Posted October 9, 2010 Author Report Posted October 9, 2010 Very nice truck Bill, too bad about the mileage...
LefroyFisherman Posted October 9, 2010 Author Report Posted October 9, 2010 Bill, how much did you lift it? the ZR2 already comes lifted a little bit, looks like a 2-3 inches. Those tires don't look much more aggressive then the stock? and you have the 4.3 vortex?
BillM Posted October 9, 2010 Report Posted October 9, 2010 (edited) Bill, how much did you lift it? the ZR2 already comes lifted a little bit, looks like a 2-3 inches. Those tires don't look much more aggressive then the stock? and you have the 4.3 vortex? Yup, 4.3 Vortex under the hood. It's just a 2in body lift, nothing special. Suspension lifts for these trucks are pretty expensive and way to high for my liking (6inch BDS lift for example). Stock tires/rims are 31x10.5x15 with a 6in backspace, mine are 285/75-16(33x12x16) with a 5in backspace so they poke out quite a bit more then stock. BFG All-Terrain TA's came with the truck, these are Toyo Open Country MT's... I'll post a front shot so you can see how different the offset is, lol. I also have the lower flarettes removed if you can tell. As for the truck itself I love it, I've pulled more big trucks out of the mud then you can imagine. Can't touch a short wheelbase truck in the mud, I don't care how many ponies you have underneath the hood. I don't commute in it (I have a TDI for that) so I basically drive it in the city and when I go fishing... Here is stock when I bought it. Front shot as it sits now. Edited October 9, 2010 by BillM
Woodsman Posted October 9, 2010 Report Posted October 9, 2010 I have a 98 Jimmy with a 4.3 & the mileage sucks. My 02 Explorer with a 4.0 by far is better mileage wise.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now