Terry

With livescope i have seen a lot of fish but the first time I marked a muskie and could even see its fins and tail moving and it was so big I just couldn’t believe it , it was worth the price of admission

Fishing regulations

Yeah that’s where I got mine and the holes did line up

I am old enough to remember when some tournament participants said sonar was unfair and should be banned electric trolling motors were next and gave an unfair advantage live catch weight and release would be the end of tournament fishing livescope need to be banned and Greta Thunberg posted in 2018 in which she said that the world will end in 2023

Your right , you still need fishing skills to catch , but I will admit my sonar died on me this winter and I packed up and went home but I’m a technical nut always have been and always will be. Sometimes I quit fishing and just watch the fishes behaviour on the scope or the camera. I have even bent the hook so I could watch perch reaction without having to bring them up and unhook them

Of course We use one livescope in a shack too I would think most people do. My point was the narrow beam and finding the position so you can see all jigs And again it was me that mentioned following baits from when it it the water back to the boat and again the point was the narrow beam to follow it back I also troll and watch my bait and the fish behind me as long as your going fairly straight it’s easy to do but if you are following a contour it’s too much work to keep turn the transducer to stay on the lure . It’s amazing how many fish follow and swipe at your lure and you never know without a camera or livescope and yes I believe some days all types sonar will spook the fish and you need just turn stuff off

I happen to have the latest equipment and I understand how it works and I know what you are saying it impractical have you ever made a cast and watched it hit the water and follow it back to the boat with livescope if you turn it even a small bit you lose your bait because of of the small angle of the signal hell , even icefishing in down mode if you turn the transducer you can lose your jigs because of the narrow beam you are looking at so small of an area and missing much of the detail you need to see

Yup, exactly what Bill says

Yes I got the ps22 the year it can out and it was wonderful, I heard about livescope lvs 32 and was on the list to get it as soon as it came out and it was wonderful X2 then I saw the lvs 34 could be used in deeper water so I got it before the next winter I fished in bass tourneys for 11 years , long before all the good tec was available but have always been on top of the latest stuff I get people texting or calling me all time on the phone to walk them through problems with their fishing tec even makes I don’t own, I can usually track down the problem So I do have some idea what I am talking about too

For structures at a good speed side image is easier to watch then livescope livescope has a very narrow right to left beam and you would have to be constantly watching all at once and moving them , livescope has no history on screen but side image does making it easier to find structure it is easier to put a waypoint on structure from side imaging then Go up front and fine now if they are using perspective mode and are 15 ft of water or under that works well for finding structure and fish I very much understand the latest equipment and if some are doing it the way you say they are wasting time

At times a agree, when I go to a fly-in or lodge I do t look at the maps of where to fish as half the fun is figuring out where they are , after a cot of days I check the map to see how close I was to there map i can’t see them looking a 2 livescope from the helm. The 4th one could be side scan but when searching for fish I am at the front of the boat ,only at the helm searching for structure

I can see why they would have 3 up front but 4 at the console makes no sense to me i guess the 4th one could be for smart gauges but why

I saw that, then I checked the price ouch

My bad

And if he had a DeLorean, him and doc could check it out

owen sound salmon spectacular

Humminbird For the most functions

my eyes have a hard time reading highlighted text, so I fixed it so I could read it Hydrogen is volatile for sure but from what I have read it is safer than gasoline. Both fuels are dangerous if there is a leak and there is enough oxygen with an ignition source. Gasoline being a liquid can be more dangerous if there is a leak because it can spread over an area and remain there for a long time with the possibility of igniting the gas and its vapors while hydrogen leaks and escapes into the air it is dangerous if the concentration of hydrogen and oxygen is high enough along with an ignition source. (Like in the Hindenburg) In fact the Hindenburg's fire was mostly due to the diesel fuel that was used to power the engines and a flammable lacquer on the outside of the ship. There seems to be little concern that hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are more dangerous than gasoline powered cars with internal combustion engines.

The only issue they need to solve is hydrogen molecules are so small it’s hard to contain them and to make seals to lines and whatnot that don’t leak

I guess they have fixed the fuel line seal problem

Nice it’s an hydrogen ice outboard and not a fuel cell for an electric outboard

Because the guy posted right above my post in your amphicat posts , so i quoted and reply in the thread that the guy posted in

I quoted and reported the post and admin deleted his post but my reply is still there so with his removed it is now confusing

Why would you post that

Here is a link to my trip with Cochrane Air. sorry many photo and videos can’t be seen now but you will get the idea https://ontariofishingcommunity.com/topic/46077-terrys-fly-in/#comment-492606