chessy Posted August 11, 2016 Report Posted August 11, 2016 with the emails that just were released she and her foundation have some explaining to do
scuro2 Posted August 11, 2016 Author Report Posted August 11, 2016 (edited) Incredibly 50 of the nation’s most senior Republican national security officials, many of them former top aides or cabinet members for President George W. Bush, have signed a letter saying they will not vote for Mr. Trump..."Donald Trump is not qualified to be President and Commander-in-Chief. Indeed, we are convinced that he would be a dangerous President and would put at risk our country’s national security and well-being. Most fundamentally, Mr. Trump lacks the character, values, and experience to be President. He weakens U.S. moral authority as the leader of the free world. He appears to lack basic knowledge about and belief in the U.S. Constitution, U.S. laws, and U.S. institutions, including religious tolerance, freedom of the press, and an independent judiciary. In addition, Mr. Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he has little understanding of America’s vital national interests, its complex diplomatic challenges, its indispensable alliances, and the democratic values on which U.S. foreign policy must be based. At the same time, he persistently compliments our adversaries and threatens our allies and friends. Unlike previous Presidents who had limited experience in foreign affairs, Mr. Trump has shown no interest in educating himself. He continues to display an alarming ignorance of basic facts of contemporary international politics. Despite his lack of knowledge, Mr. Trump claims that he understands foreign affairs and “knows more about ISIS than the generals do.” “Well, I respond by saying that I wasn’t using any of them and they would have loved to have been involved with the campaign,” Trump said. “And these were the people that have been there a long time,” he continued. “Washington establishment people that have been there for a long time. Look at the terrible job they’ve done. I hadn’t planned on using any of these people. They don’t feel relevant because of that and they form a group and they go out and try to get some publicity for themselves and they hope that somebody else other than Trump wins because that way they can get a job,” he added. Yup, what 50 of his own parties top security members said means nothing because they have too much experience. Edited August 11, 2016 by scuro2
John Bacon Posted August 11, 2016 Report Posted August 11, 2016 Reached a new low!!! https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/09/trump-gun-owners-clinton-judges-second-amendment Maybe not a new low; but low that has been reached before... http://conservativetribune.com/hill-trashes-trump/ http://conservativetribune.com/the-media-loves-joe-bidens-jokes/ http://fightingfortrump.com/hillary-once-suggested-obamas-assassination/
manitoubass2 Posted August 11, 2016 Report Posted August 11, 2016 (edited) Relax. Its from someone who knows someone that heard something. The media is as reliable as trump is stupid. Funny they report it 3 months after it "apperently" happened. Trumps an idiot, hillary is a criminal. End thread Im all for chatting. But this thread leads me to one conclusion... "If ignorance is bliss". Edited August 11, 2016 by manitoubass2
Spiel Posted August 11, 2016 Report Posted August 11, 2016 The continuous bashing of people and nations in the political threads are getting to the point where it is hurting the site without any real benefit. We have decided to limit them severely in the future. Note, there may likely be some amendments to the forums rules. Stay tuned.
aplumma Posted August 11, 2016 Report Posted August 11, 2016 Yup time for a meeting after reading this thread and others like it recently it is apparent that people have taken liberties that just are not making this site a place for everyone to be comfortable at. Art
Recommended Posts