outllaw Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 looking at the ofah rewads for big fish i noticed. a award for a 37.20 walleye. is this the new record. caught on erie last year
BUSTER Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 thats fat, i cant recall but how much bigger is it ,cmpared to the old record?
ozaibak1 Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 Holy moly, wow! Definately would not have imagined those still exist in eerie considering the fishing pressure, but that's why its a 'Great' Lake. Wonder how many that size have broken off due to equipment failures?
Terry Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 that would be inches not lbs or is it lbs...not I would have to see it 37.20 " baby, not a breeder yet...LOL now if you say it's that many lbs I would really like to see it
e-z-out Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 Terry you look young in that pic how old is it?
bigfish1965 Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 Any claim without a picture is just a story....
Greencoachdog Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 that would be inches not lbs or is it lbs...not I would have to see it 37.20 " baby, not a breeder yet...LOL now if you say it's that many lbs I would really like to see it I can see why that "thing" bit your hook, it was starving to death!!! Rick OBanion Posted Today, 08:12 PM Any claim without a picture is just a story.... Yup! Terry is right though, OFAH awards are for inches... not lbs.
Terry Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 I was a member of this forum when I caught it, but I can't remember when there is no photoshop there...for sure and you are right it was one skinny fish but long and I mean long
danc Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 Hey Terry? Nice shirt!!!! That's my favorite too Roy. I'm guessing that Terry went fishing right after church that day.
Terry Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 one must dress for success....LOL but really, I got warned that I was getting way too much sun, so I started wearing long sleeve shirts
Roy Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 Vitamin D will never hurt you Bud. Lack of it will. edit: Sorry, didn't mean to highjack the thread.
fishboy Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 one must dress for success....LOL but really, I got warned that I was getting way too much sun, so I started wearing long sleeve shirts I'm disappointed in the lack of a tie...nice fish though
irishfield Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 Like to see a picture of that one George.. ..and Terry.. just how old IS that blue jacket??
kickingfrog Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 Like to see a picture of that one George.. ..and Terry.. just how old IS that blue jacket?? Quality never goes out of style.
outllaw Posted April 5, 2009 Author Report Posted April 5, 2009 the pictures on another website. . i dont know how to import it.
irishfield Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 (edited) the pictures on another website. . i dont know how to import it. Right click on the picture George. click "properties".. copy that and then come here and type [ img ] [ /img ] and put the properties between them with no spacing between the [ and img or the brackets and the properties. Edited April 5, 2009 by irishfield
irishfield Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 outlaw sent me the picture of this 37.2 inch 'eye. Guess the guy has a LONG torso because mine is only about 27" from below the belt line to above my eyeballs..
kickingfrog Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 outlaw sent me the picture of this 37.2 inch 'eye. Guess the guy has a LONG torso because mine is only about 27" from below the belt line to above my eyeballs.. That is a very nice walleye. But I don't see how it could be 37.2 inches. Let the games begin.
BassAsin Posted April 5, 2009 Report Posted April 5, 2009 one must dress for success....LOL but really, I got warned that I was getting way too much sun, so I started wearing long sleeve shirts i agree!
Cookslav Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 Its a nice Pickeral fer sure but 37.5" might be what I would refer to as "an excited guestimate" Probobly no measuring tape at hand so it was eyeballed....but that being said I'm no expert and am well aware that Photos can be a bit tricky to judge some times especialy with out the tape handy. But.... It gives me a chance to post my PB 32" Pickeral as a comparison 32" and nothing more
gone_fishin Posted April 6, 2009 Report Posted April 6, 2009 But....It gives me a chance to post my PB 32" Pickeral as a comparison good enough for me... LOL. Nice Fish!!! here's another 32"er... for... ummm... comparison also...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now