You’re gonna be fine.
That chart doesn’t separate ‘microwave’ and ‘radio waves’ because it’s all the same.
All of this is considered non-ionizing radiation. This means it will only produce thermal resonance in a cell, or change electron valence. Ionizing radiation will destabilize at atom entirely (X-ray, gamma rays, UV rays). The World Health organization 10 years ago ratified the WiGig standard and concluded these spectrums only produce non-ionizing radiation which affects tissue by less than 1 degree C. This means it was impossible to measure any effect.
Without knowing to ask for it, you are worried about whether non-ionizing radiation has unknown effects on tissue. This is the same thing Belgium, Florida are suggesting.
The answer is you shouldn’t worry about it. You’re afraid of something you don’t understand. (So am I but nothing to do but read about it!) There’s 40 years of MRI, CTs, Xrays, more time than that with radio and radiation. The engineers who make this stuff understand it, test it and bring it to market.
Even if there is more research to be done, the fact you jump to some corporate/government scheme because of the information that you’ve presented is just not an effective way to respond. You really think these engineers are building stuff to melt their customers from the inside?
Also, be sure to remember that you now desire more government oversight, more interference in the private sector.
An article or video without adequate data is just fear mongering. A video of a politician with their mouth moving is the least reputable form of evidence I can imagine.
Edited to add, thank you for posting this stuff though. I like the discussion and hopefully I’ll be slightly less dickish in the future.