dave524

I used to fish Erindale in the 80's and 90's, never in Oct. but once the Chinooks were done and a good rain had purged the system of their carcasses, the loogans were for the most part were gone and the roads heading to GBay were getting treacherous at 5am with ice, I would slum it on the Credit. Fishing was actually pretty good with browns and bows with the later running Coho back then a bonus, crowd wise in Nov. and Dec. no worse than Thornbury, both in numbers and idiots. I've recently retired and thought I would give it a go again as it would be within my capablities health wise. Hope I am not setting myself for disappointment, you guys are not sounding all that encouraging.

To hunt lands belonging to the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority you now need to purchase a permit for $30, I believe. Personally, as far as benefits to me as a hunter I'd rather give my 30 bucks to the Federation.

Nice pics, curiously that last Widgeon looks like its still moulting, undeveloped primaries, is that common for out there?? Birds here have finished long ago, noticed the comment about them not flying much yet, is that why?

I've had a situation were anglers were actually beneficial on bigger water and respected the area of our set. They kept bumping into birds while fishing, keeping them moving long after they would have settled in for the day. Sometimes the birds they bumped would hit our spread

Nice bunch of woodies there, is that a ringneck on the bottom left? I'm sure if you save the wood duck flank feathers some fly tyer would gladly take them off your hands. Good shootin.

Nice shots, 1st and 3rd buck could be the same animal , great inside spread 20"+,, the last one, the ten pointer is really nice, you got a great spot there. Nice yote pic too.

Personally , I would only go the dipsey route if I was fishing for suspended fish a ways off the bottom. I've had good luck with a bottom bouncer sinker, looks kinda like a spinner bait without the jig head just a weight in its place and a swivel were the spinner would be, use a 4-5 foot leader off the swivel back to the rapala. Found them relatively snagproof. Or, use a three way swivel and a lighter pound dropper to the old bell sinker and the same 4-5 foot leader back to the rapala. Just adjust acordingly when making contact with bottom. Edit: these guys https://ssl10.securedata.net/gapen/tackle.html

The details...................if enquiring minds would like to know http://www.cbc.ca/news/story/1998/04/16/fish980416a.html

Thanks, I heard about it briefly on the news but never followed it up. Surprised to see that I live on the edge of the impact zone. Never saw a thing.

Great waterfowl shooting, don't think I've ever got such a mixed bag of geese, divers and puddlers. Little surprised to see blue wing's in there if they were taken in the Kawarthas, even at Long Point guys are sayin they are for the most part already gone. Good shootin

More salmon spawning is good up to a certain point. What everyone fails to realize is the "carrying capacity " of the nursery water and the ability of the fry/smolts to reach full term , that is in the end the number of new fish that will be entering the population in the lake. Once you reach a certain number of spawning fish any increase in the number of spawners will not impact the number of recruits to the population. To achieve the numbers of fish that anglers want in the lake I think we are looking at augmenting the natural production with hatchery fish . I'm not condoning the flagrant waste of fish for roe or the guys that think they need several gallon ziplock baggies for personal use, bet more is wasted than actually gets used as bait Probably preaching to the choir here as most of us here that use roe are not guilty of the excesses that we witness, but I don't think responsible collection of a few eggs as bait impacts the population.

At one time when carrying a shotgun for self defense against bears it was an unwritten rule that you had it loaded with 00 buckshot. In the event that it was contested that it was not self defense, the spread of the shot would be your alibi, if the 9 or 12 pellets could be covered by the palm of a hand it was obvious the bear was very close as opposed to a slug or a rifle where the range could not be readily verified. Truth is , at self defense ranges, feet not yards, a duckload would probably work.

I've had them for quite some time but I have a pair of high green rubber Nokias that have a removeable felt liner, they are good for slushy condition and around water also fairly warm. Edit: this page show the different models, may want to consider the studs as well, that is new to me. http://www.nokianfootwear.com/

I see it's a lot cheaper if you don't fish migratory salmon and trout, almost 1/3 the price. Hope our MNR doesn't pick up on that. Edit: that didn't come out right. Should have worded it " I see it is a lot more expensive if you fish migratory salmon and trout , almost 3X the price"

There are some areas where walleyes will target the frogs when they migrate to the shores of lakes for hibernation, get them quite shallow in the fall evenings then.

Not in the least, tried it many times , never got into it. Glad I live close to the Niagara for my off season fix.

There is a real danger from having a trace of lube in the chamber of a centrefire rifle, but it is not due to any explosive characteristics of the lube. Upon ignition of the powder charge the brass case expands and actually grips the walls of the chamber so that 50- 60,000 psi is distributed evenly throughout the chamber. In the event that there is lube in the chamber and combined with the slightly tapered shape of the case there will be excessive force directed back on the bolt face, warning signs of this will be a slight flattening of the headstamp lettering, flow of brass into ejector plunger hole, hard opening of the bolt with a bolt action as you can actually shear off this brass flow into the ejector, in a more serious case you can get a primer puncture and hot gas leaking back into the action towards the shooter, permanent springing of the action causing a condition of excessive headspace ( rear locking actions like the British Lee Enfield were known for this and actually had interchangeable bolt heads of various lengths to correct this) and ocassionally castrophic failure resulting in perhaps serious injury to the shooter. PLEASE be sure to remove any storage lube from your chamber and bore before the start of the season.

The attitude that Pike are somehow a less desireable gamefish existed before this whole pike versus muskie controversy. When I was a kid in the 50's and early 60's we legally speared them like a coarsefish in the spring. At university in the late 60's early70's, I had friends that were outdoors guys from northwestern Ontario that used to joke about the Americans and Europeans that paid big bucks to go Jack fishing up there, the locals despised pike. The basis of this was that they were a predator of more desireable species like pickeral and speckled trout. There was a lot of misguided efforts to control various predator species earlier in the 1900's.

At the 8 pounds listed for weight, I would find it a quite heavy for an upland gun. The ic choke would work with the old style foster type slugs but a rifled bore is really needed for the modern sabot slugs which greatly increase accuracy and range. As for versatility, adaptability and the availability of aftermarket accesories including barrells of any type nothing comes close to a Remington 870. It is the largest selling shotgun of all times with about ten million in total sales for good reason. Almost 50 years in the field and I have owned side by sides, over and unders, autos and pumps but if I had to do it over again I would go with a 12 gauge 870 with a 28" barrel with interchangeable tubes and a rifled slug barrel with a cantilever scope mount (there are combo packages available) and a 20 guage 870 with a 26" barrel improved cylinder or tubes. You could hunt everything from woodcock to geese and deerhunt with that combo and never feel overly compromised in your firearm choice.

Just a thought, for the difference in price between an 870 and the Benelli you could probably buy a respectable rifle for big game.

The glimmer of hope I saw in the preseason was quickly laid to rest with the start of the regular season, same old, same old, same old.

I was just trying to avert a costly mistake with that old friend of yours. Actually, there is a new tungsten based non-toxic shell on the market that I was unaware of when I posted. It is a tungsten/polymer shot, sounds like it is little balls of nylon with tungsten powder in them for weight. It is said to be safe in older guns as it a softer compound but I assume it would also be very hard to find and would be priced way up there too. LPS , I use LPS-1 more as a cleaner of powder residue in gas operated autos and a short term metal protectant. When I put a firearm away for a longer period, there is LPS-3, which is specifically a metal protectant that I use , just a light spray on a soft cloth and it puts a slightly waxy film over the metal but it should be removed before using the gun the following season, especially in the chamber, bore and locking mechanism of the gun. Works good too for storage of less used things like cast iron bullet molds ( I use traditional muzzleloaders) and even on hitch receivers so they don't corrode and get stuck.

CAUTION !!!!!!!!!! The shells you want for that M59 are not the tungsten. There are tunsten/steel blends out there and they are every bit as hard and destructive on older barrels as straight steel. They are essentially steel loads, the tungsten is very heavy and is alloyed with steel to give the shot more weight and better downrange ballistics. The shells you need to get to waterfowl with that gun are the BISMUTH, which is about the same weight and hardness as lead.

I'll back up Stocco Lake, went there musky fishing with a friend who was in the air force at Trenton a few times. Seemed like every run from one spot to another at high speed we would see these pods of gar floating just below the surface.

Nice Coho. I really really like Cohos in the river, glad they are back on stocking lists. When I used to target them, they were about the last fish to enter the rivers on Lake O, often late November or early Dec just before ice up, even have encountered the odd one still alive the following March during ice break up. This new strain is obviously a much earlier spawner. They are far more willing to hit than Chinooks, seems to be in better shape further up river than Chinooks are and put up a far more acrobatic fight than Chinooks. Also for anyone wanting to target them, they liked green, not chartreuse but a real Kelly/ Forest/ deep grass green. Don't know why, not saying that it is still the hot colour , but would be my go-to colour initially. Did I mention I like river Cohos??