scuro2 Posted January 11, 2015 Report Posted January 11, 2015 (edited) This fishing report has taken quite some time to do right because it is two stories, the disaster being the harder story to tell right. We went to Quesnel lake BC in late July. We had problems with the trip right from the start. It was a bit of a gamble to take my 80 year old mom across the country to a remote BC fishing camp. My mom is losing her eyesight and wanted the opportunity to go back to Rockies 50 years later...[VIDEO] [/VIDEO]It also ended up being a trip that would have far more significance then we ever originally thought, we were on location of what would soon be Canada's biggest ecological disaster of 2014.Before we left home reports foreshadowed what was to come. The main Banff to Jasper road had been closed due to wildfires. At that time sections of the road from Banff to Jasper had been closed, along with other sections of highways in BC so we left Toronto uncertain if we could even travel to our destinations. Rain had come with our arrival and as we ascended highway #1 to Banff the weather and air cleared. We only had any sense of the destructive power of the recent forest fires as we turned east on the Highway #93 towards Rocky Mountain House and our accommodations. Fire crews were visible from the road and in the distance we saw flames licking up 100 ft trees in certain hotspots.All the worry was for nothing, everything went our way the following days. The heatwave ended with enough showers to dampen fires and the air was crisp and clear. Jasper Park was new to us both and awe inspiring. We loved it.The second part of the trip was based strictly on a hunch that if there is incredible Laker fishing in the Yukon, at a minimum a 100 km remote BC lake should offer great BC fishing. After we passed Jasper we weaved around the two main rocky mountain chains in a giant "S" to get to the west side of the interior mountains. We came up through the interior plain by way of 100 Mile house. The area has a "western" look especially closer to Kamloops. But, as we climbed to Quesnel Lake the landscape became more temperate and looked familiar, like a northern Ontario landscape but on a much grander scale.We got lost on our drive in. It was about an hour in by dirt road from the town of Horsefly but we took a wrong turn instead towards the the small hamlet of Likely. We drove all the way to Lake Quesnel before we finally saw a local by his cabin who redirected us. Less then 10 days later this road would be blown out by what is now Canada's most catastrophic tailings pond breach of Imperial Gold mines on Mount Polley.The start of our stay on Quesnel lake couldn't of been better weather wise. We brought the sun with us and I awoke that first day on lake Quesnel to what would be 4 days 26 to 29 degrees of mostly sun. This was blind laker and bow fishing. The water was so clear that you could often sight the bottom. I had fished bows back home in a body of water that would be seen as nothing but a big creek out here with a maximum depth of 40-50 ft. The deepest part of Lake Quesnel has been estimated to be 1700 ft deep but no true reading has been taken! The fishing was familiar with the same gear and it was good to catch this bow right away. Back home a few small bows and browns would be a good afternoon of fishing. Out here it was sore arm fishing. Some lures hadn't seen action in years and caught fish here.BC Lakers are neither shy of the light or people. At first I thought I was just lucky or incredibly brilliant in my choice of lures and approach. The locals were all raving about Apex lures which I scoffed at and never used. Just a cheap plastic action lure but locals raved about them while I was there. My plan was to fish this lake using mostly unused methods and lures. The hope was to catch a trophy laker by giving these fish a look they hadn't seen. It turned out the choice of lure didn't really matter that much. More often then not you would catch fish any time you changed locations and you had a decent plan of attack about the new spot. The plan of attack often simply involved noting wind direction and fishing where the water got dark you fish. That worked great except early in the morning and on windy days.This lake has Lakers, Char, and bows. Nothing huge, bows into the low 20s. I saw no Dollies, they are now protected and catch and release only....and lakers were there into the 30s.What was impressive about this lake was the fish hit parade...steady fishing till 1pm. In fact you could probably fish the whole day but I felt it would be too selfish to go much past noon while my mom didn't have company.My strategy, if after two passes I didn't catch fish I would move on. I never really fished more then two spots in a morning. Often I had to move early in the morning due to low visibility, where the sun hadn't climbed up over the mountains. Laker and bow fishing that doesn't turn on till after 9am...that was a head scratcher.Evenings were spent cruising with mom, sometimes lightly fishing. No pressure to produce, that had been taken care of in the morning.What was incredible was just how stuffed some of these fish were.Where were the trophy Lakers? I didn't get a wiff of one. The locals I talked to all seemed to have never caught a bigger laker then in the lower 30s. The lake is considered a trophy bow lake and in the past they pulled out real monsters but back then they had no limits so everyone would keep their trophies and cut them up into steaks. Now there are limits.Lakers are seen as a nuisance fish and they are upping the catch limit to 3 a day next year. Funny, in Ontario Lakers are disappearing from one lake after another.Not all was easy. BC has a regulation that a lone fishermen can fish two lines. Even though I didn't really need to fish with two lines I often did.Two lines out resulted in multiple doubles on my own...it each time it was a total gong show as they say out in BC. It got to the point where I put the iffy lure on the second rod and fished both lures at the same depth in the hope that I would only get one hit. It is a unique experience to try to hook two good sized fish and and bring them both into the boat while controlling the boat. Many good fish were lost!...and often it was a rush to get the fish to the boat and back in the water.One could drink water right out of the lake and that is no longer advisable.Probably my favorite catch, not for the size but the mesmerizing beauty and detail.A Laker that back home would be something to brag about, well here they came in bunches. On this day I caught a 30 incher, a 29, and a 27 all on the same spot in an hour.My last moment fishing saw me on a shoal admiring a Laker purposefully cruising the shoal like a shark on the flat in 10 ft of water. It was 1pm and the Laker was swimming directly at the boat before it flicked off! What a calling card for next year![VIDEO] [/VIDEO]But this was soon to be a paradise lost..... Edited January 14, 2015 by scuro2
scuro2 Posted January 11, 2015 Author Report Posted January 11, 2015 (edited) The canoe in the pic came from the Polley lake campsite.Lake Quesnel is a 100 km long interior BC lake known as a trophy rainbow lake. High season may well start with the August holiday weekend when the first of hundreds of thousands of spawning salmon return back to this watershed. Up the lake at Elyssia resort all the best cabins were rented. Tragically on this holiday Monday in the early hours of the morning, Imperial Metals huge tailings pond collapsed. Seventeen million cubic meters of water, more then the the equivalent of 2,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools, along with 8 million cubic meters of potentially toxic effluent roared down Hazeltine creek. What may have saved the lives of campers asleep on Polly lake just a 1/2 km away was that the tidal wave of slurry made a sharp right hand turn away from Polley lake sparing it of most of the effulent. Even so runoff from the collapse raised the level of Polley lake 5 ft. Even from 10 km away Likely residents could hear the roaring of effluent which continued to scour the creek bed down to Quensel lake. The 4 ft wide creek was now a 150 ft wide torrent of frothing brown liquid. This continued for hours into the later part of the morning. The force of that much liquid snapped large trees in half and blew out two bridges. Communication of the disaster happened by word of mouth and did not happen in an orderly way. Employees on site first phoning relatives. Some town residents only found out about the disaster through the media.When the disaster occurred we had just returned from BC and couldn't initially make sense of the news reports about Mount Polley lake near Likely BC. As we saw the news reports and referenced that information to what we knew of that area we were stunned to learn the lake we had just fished was now contaminated. Even so I probably would have put this in the memory banks except that the very people who locals were to trust were not believable. How could that much pollution not show up on the Ministry of the Environment's tests for drinking water quality? Welcome to Mine friendly BC.Three days after the disaster B.C. Premier Christy Clark met with Likely residents concerned for their water safety. She said the chief medical health officer would be making the decisions about whether the water is safe for residents to drink..."Everybody across British Columbia, our hearts are with you. This is a pristine resource for everybody, but for nobody more than you. And I know it's just been a terrible, terrible heartache. We are going to be with you, shoulder to shoulder, to do everything we can to return it to the real pristine beauty we all know this lake is for our province, because this is just such an incredible, incredible asset and so important to all of you." Clark shared the initial water quality test results which showed no contamination.Four days after the disaster, B.C. Environment Minister Mary Polak announced the second set of water-quality testing results. The samples were taken on the 2nd day after the disaster at five different locations along the Quesnel River, to determine potential impacts on drinking water quality and aquatic life. Jennifer McGuire, also with the ministry, said there was still no expectation that aquatic life would be impacted by cadmium levels. "We do feel comfortable in the context of risk for human health rescinding the order (in those areas)," said Corneil. "It meets the Canadian drinking water standards, as well as standards for potable drinking water in multiple systems." "Analysis of these samples indicate that none of the chemical and physical parameter concentrations exceeded B.C. or Health Canada drinking water guidelines," said a memo that was distributed with the results. All tests showed little to no contamination. At the time I wrote, "I am at a loss about the testing. Results for the 5th are in. The (second day) results still looks relatively really good. They have taken the drinking ban off for Likely....How do you have that much sediment flow into a lake and not see it in any form of the testing? Things like turbidity or suspended solids". That's right, the MoE removed the drinking ban for the town of Likely 4 days after the disaster.I decided to check for myself. Looking at the MoE's results the original two days of tests occurred approximately 7 km or more away from where the slurry entered the water and only 6 samples were taken. All initially reported testing was done near the surface. More startling to discover a week later was that the MoE tested near Hazeltine creek at different depth levels during the first two days but chose not to release these results! Those results especially below the water surface exceeded provincial standards. One can not help but be highly cynical that how the government handled this was no mistake. If you don't test where the containment will most likely be is it any surprise that the results would show little to worry about. Ten days later a lot of the contaminated water would have flowed down the Fraser river or would be settling on the bottom of the lake. Out of sight, out of mind, out of the news cycle. But water movement is counter intuitive especially on such a big wind swept lake.The claim that the drinking water was safe was as bogus as the initial claim that a majority of the contaminants had been contained by a log jam at the mouth of the Hazeltine creek. Less then two weeks after the disaster the MoE stated, After today, the province will no longer be providing daily updates on the Mount Polley tailings pond breach in Likely. The people and businesses in the area are “on the road to recovery.” We were to also learn that the spill was 70% bigger then first estimated. Cloudy plumes began surfacing on the lake. Further testing results began showing elevated level of contaminants. A water ban came back into effect and then residents of Likely were told once again not to drink cloudy water. Some slurry particles are no bigger then a micron. Bacteria is about two micron's wide. The naked eye can't see anything under 40 microns wide yet cloudy water was the sole criteria to determine if water was safe to drink? Also while the water within the tailings pond was neutral your stomach is acidic. Can the MoE state with any authority that slurry granules containing these chemicals ( Manganese, Copper, Vanadium, Cobalt, Antimony, Arsenic, Lead, Selenium, Cadmium, and Mercury ) pose no health risk to ingested? The Engineer of Record for the Mount Polley Mine, Knight Piésold, describes itself as the "former engineer of record of the tailings storage facility at Mount Polley," and said that it informed Imperial that it would no longer continue in that role as of February 2011. Knight Piésold commented that during the time it acted as engineer of record, the tailings storage facility at Mount Polley "operated safely and as it was designed," and was subjected to multiple third-party reviews. The firm said that since Feb. 10, 2011, it "has not had any responsibility or knowledge of any aspects of the design, modifications or performance monitoring of the tailings storage facility at Mount Polley. The original engineering done by Knight Piésold Ltd. accommodated a significantly lower water volume than the tailings storage facility reportedly held at the time of the breach. Significant engineering and design changes were made subsequent to our involvement, such that the tailings storage facility can no longer be considered a Knight Piésold Ltd. design.Upon completing all assignments as the engineer of record in 2010, Knight Piésold wrote to Mount Polley Mining Corp. and to the Government of British Columbia’s Chief Inspector of Mines and stated that ‘the embankments and the overall tailings impoundment are getting large and it is extremely important that they be monitored, constructed and operated properly to prevent problems in the future.’ A formal handover of design, construction and monitoring responsibilities was conducted on March 8, 2011, when AMEC Earth and Environmental was acknowledged as the new engineer of record for all future work at the Mount Polley tailings storage facility." And the final washing of the hands: "Knight Piésold Ltd. is not familiar with, and therefore cannot comment on, the details of the incident, or on the design, construction, operations, water-management practices or any other aspects of the Mount Polley tailings storage facility."The University of Victoria’s Environmental Law Centre warned in 2012 that environmental assessment certificates for mines issued by government are often “vague and unenforceable.” It said that by 2008 the number of mine inspections had fallen to half what they were in 2001. Small wonder — Ministry of Environment staff shrank by 25 per cent. The chief mining inspector said he had insufficient staff to complete the annual mine monitoring reports required. “This ramshackle enforcement regime is not good enough for an industry that can create environmental and financial catastrophes,” the study said.The president of Imperial Metals, Brian Kynoch stated the water is close to drinking water but the silt is the issue. A summary of material dumped into the tailings pond last year was filed with Environment Canada. It said there was 326 tonnes of nickel, over 400,000 kilograms of arsenic, 177,000 kilograms of lead and 18,400 tonnes of copper and its compounds placed in the pond last year. Mercury has not been detected in the water and arsenic levels are 1/5th of that of drinking water. According to Kynoch the water is not toxic to rainbow trout. The water use ban was apparently more to "Err on the side of caution" than a requirement..."Yes, I would drink the water, but it's of no consequence," the company head replied. "I would drink the water once the solids come out."In a news release the MoE stated, "Often areas where mines are located have elevated levels of metals, meaning naturally occurring metal concentrations are often much greater in this region than elsewhere in the province. "Scientific evidence tells us that the metals are not likely to readily move from the sediment into the water, and are therefore not likely to present a risk to future water quality," it said. Leachability tests, to be conducted in the next few days, should confirm this. Interior Health continues to assess sample results provided by the ministry for any potential human health risks. These results provide further reassurance to the decision to partially rescind the "Do Not Use" to the impact zone involving Polley Lake, Hazeltine Creek and a small part of Quesnel Lake".With Imperial Metals and the tailings pond, what was put in tailings pond is the rock that has been ground down to get at the metals. The left over material is finer then sand and is mixed with the water and other chemicals used in the extraction process. When they talk about toxins within the pond, these toxins are not in liquid form but bound to tiny granules. Leaching happens when the acidity within the environment strips toxins away from the granules. No one really knows about the degree of potential health impacts of such large scale contamination, and if any of the contaminants will leach into the water over longer periods of time or be absorbed by other methods into the food chain. Lake Quesnel has become one giant science experiment.Skeed Borkowski runs the Northern Lights fly fishing lodge on lake Quesnel. He comments, they killed my beautiful lake. “They can’t take those toxins out,” he said. “They’ll dissipate. They’ll disappear. But I will never, ever, ever drink out of this lake again. You couldn’t convince me. But the reality of it is, we don’t even know what’s going to happen to this. And the unknown is what’ll keep people from coming here. If you had the choice would you want to take your kids swimming here?”. The attached link below contains an interview with Skeed.http://www.desmog.ca/2014/08/26/last-cast-northern-lights-lodge-dims-early-after-mount-polley-mine-spill After complaining in writing to the Ministry of Energy and Mines about safety conditions at the mine, Chambers says he received a phone call “saying my services were no longer needed there.” Larry Chambers warned Imperial Metals that its tailings pond was bound to fail – and he was fired for it, the Likely. He and his wife, Lawna Bourassa-Keuster, have now lost their home on once-beautiful Quensnel Lake – too afraid to drink the cloudy and discoloured water, which they brought with them to Vancouver in a jar. “Christy Clark did come to Likely and at that time, she informed us that she would make sure that Quesnel Lake would be brought back to its pristine state,” said Bourassa-Keuster. “We haven’t seen or heard from her since. Chambers described instances of being bullied by supervisors at the mine for insisting on safety standards that were not being properly implemented. Gerald MacBurney, a former tailings foreman quit this past June, saying one of the main reasons was the stress of the job. “I fought those guys for two years,” he says, “the management at Polley, to get rock like they were supposed to, and build the dam properly. Doing my job, and then they would not do the stuff that you wanted, you know? I just couldn’t take it anymore.” “They needed to put in five million tonnes [of rock] around the dam, because they added, once they went to a bigger mine life, they added five times the amount of water,” adds MacBurney. “That dam was never designed to hold five times that amount of water.” “Five million tonnes, well we got maybe a couple hundred thousand. And that’s it, in two years. I’d had enough.” He says they had a breach at the tailings pond in May and the company “just patched things together.” “[They] carried on going up instead of wider and doing the proper way of doing it,” says MacBurney.MacBurney says management is to blame. “They’d send their reports to Vancouver, management at Polley, and all they cared about was making sure there was enough waste rock moved and enough ore moved, they didn’t care about tailings. Tailings was like nothing, nothing to them.” He says the government is just as much to blame for what happened. “They were there in May because we had the breach, they call it high water, I know what a breach is and I know what high water is. It came over the till. That’s an automatic breach.”Sensing looming layoffs at Mt. Polley mine, Williams Lake City Council is asking the provincial government to allow the mine to begin operating again. Williams Lake City Councillor Surinderpal Rathor stated, All 360 employees, most of whom live in Williams Lake and surrounding areas, are still on the job performing mitigation work in the wake of the breach August 4th. However city councillor Surinderpal Rathor says there’s a fear layoffs could come before Christmas. “I’ve spoken to the mine’s manager and he says they’re bleeding money faster than anything. He doesn’t think they’ll have enough work for all the employees there. And if no measures are taken they might have to lay off a large percentage of the staff.”Mount Polley began handing out layoff notices to 36 of its employees on Remembrance Day, effectively reducing its workforce by 11 per cent. At first everyone’s in shock, “said Paul French, United Steelworkers Local 1425 president. “Then comes the fear of them losing their job. Now we’re in the reality stage of ‘OK now what do I do?'”Brian Kynoch, president of Imperial Metals Corp., told a crowd of about 200 people gathered in the Likely, B.C., community centre that the water from the tailings pond is almost drinking water quality... RELATIVELY BENIGN AND HE WOULD DRINK IT. "The solids at Mount Polley are relatively benign — low mercury, very low arsenic, low metal content," he added. His Minister of Mining stated, “I’m not an engineer, I’m not a geotechnical person and I’m not a chemist, but we all know the company has been saying throughout this that they’re pretty confident about the quality of the water in their tailings pond and they’re also pretty confident about what is in their tailings. Today at 9:00, they posted on their company website what’s in their tailings and what it looks like to me – as a non-technical person – is there is a really good chance we’re going to get lucky here. N. Murray Edwards, the controlling shareholder of Imperial Metals Corp. which owns the Mount Polley mine, helped organize a $1-million private fundraiser in Calgary last year to bolster B.C. Premier Christy Clark’s re-election bid. Edwards, an oilpatch billionaire and chairman of Canadian Natural Resources, was among several Alberta power-brokers involved in the fundraiser, reportedly held to back the continuation of Clark’s “free-enterprise government.” According to polls at the time, the B.C. New Democrats were poised to win the May 13 election.The private affair came just three months after Clark, in an address to the University of Calgary’s school of public policy in October 2012, hailed Edwards as a “great Calgarian” and credited him with helping to boost B.C.’s economic development. “Mining is an area where we have set some pretty ambitious targets. We’re planning to build 17 new and expanded mines by 2015. Mining revenues have grown by 20 per cent to $8.6 billion since we introduced our Jobs Plan last year, and we’ve done it with the highest standard of sustainable mining in the world,” Clark said in the October 2012 address.“A significant part of our progress in British Columbia comes from people like Murray Edwards, it comes from investors and people who are located right here in Calgary.”Edwards, Canada’s 18th richest person with a net worth of about $2.2 billion according to Forbes, is linked to six corporations that have donated a total of $436,227 in campaign contributions to the B.C. Liberal party over the past nine years, according to Elections B.C.As if self monitoring and self compliance didn't help lead up to this disaster in the first place, the MoE believes Imperial Metals is beyond reproach and has left all future long term testing of water up to IM. From the MoE's Question and Answer sheet:"12. What long-term water quality monitoring will be put in place?The Mount Polley Mining Corp is currently developing a water quality monitoring plan. The Ministry of Environment will Review and provide feedback to ensure the plan meets provincial requirements to protect human health and the environment. The submitted plan will be shared with First Nations and IHA to ensure the plan addresses other parties’ expectations.The plan will be posted publicly on the ministry’s dedicated Mt.Polley website when it is completed and satisfies Ministry of Environment requirements".Analysts say cleanup costs for Imperial Metals' Mount Polley tailings disaster could cost anywhere from $50 million to $500 million, but the security bonds available today to help cover that are now a fraction of that. Documents from the Ministry of Energy and Mines on July 25, 2013 suggest that Mount Polley Mining Corporation (owned by Imperial Metals) was expected to pay security bonds of $38 million by 2023, and that it had deposited $14.5 million as of March 2014.Company president, Brian Kynoch has indicated that the company’s insurance costs may not be enough to cover the spill costs (CBC News, 08/14). Other news reports claim that Imperial Metals has only $15 million in property and business interruption insurance coverage and $10 million in third-party liability insurance. There is no mention of environmental liability insurance.The University of Victoria’s Environmental Law Centre warned in 2012 that environmental assessment certificates for mines issued by government are often “vague and unenforceable.” It said that by 2008 the number of mine inspections had fallen to half what they were in 2001. Small wonder — Ministry of Environment staff shrank by 25 per cent. The chief mining inspector said he had insufficient staff to complete the annual mine monitoring reports required. “This ramshackle enforcement regime is not good enough for an industry that can create environmental and financial catastrophes,” the study said.B.C. Mines Minister Bill Bennett says the Mount Polley tailings dam collapse is not an environmental disaster, equating it to the “thousands” of avalanches that happen annually in B.C. Bennett, pointing to initial positive water readings, asserted his contention will be proven in the next several weeks.A crew of natives went to Hazeltine creek to check things out for themselves. The site was deeply disturbing to them and they reported noxious fumes which made it difficult to breath. Overall it has been the natives who have kept the issue of the disaster in the spotlight. Many of the miners and citizens of Likely want to move on. That might not be possible just yet.The tailing dam failure on Aug. 4 released millions of cubic metres of water and tailings containing potentially toxic metals into Polley Lake adjacent to the mine, Hazeltine Creek and Quesnel Lake. Residents in Likely, on the shores of Quesnel River near the mine site, have raised concerns about the cloud of sediment that appears and disappears from time to time, described as a “funny” green colour. The B.C. government and Imperial Metals have acknowledged the plume, but UNBC’s research is the first to characterize the size of the sediment cloud. “In a matter of a few hours, the watershed was affected at an extent never before seen, and that will possibly last for decades,” said UNBC professor Phil Owens. The plume of sediment, typically located below 25 metres, is moving both down the lake towards the town of Likely and up the lake past Cariboo Island, UNBC’s research shows.The mouth of Halzeltine creek two months later Imperial Metals does not have a cleanup plan for the lake, or know whether it will be necessary. To determine what needs to be done in Quesnel Lake, the company is awaiting results from its consultant Tetra Tech EBA, which has a 37-foot research boat on the lake carrying out bottom sampling and water testing, Robertson said. Tetra Tech EBA is part of a coterie of consultants — including SNC Lavalin and Golder Associates — hired by Imperial Metals to work on a cleanup plan.The B.C. Ministry of the Environment has ordered the Mount Polley mine northeast of Williams Lake, B.C. to stop discharging effluent into Hazeltine Creek. The provincial order comes only a day after (Sept 8th) residents said they witnessed slurry being pumped from Polley Lake near the mine downstream into Hazeltine Creek and Quesnel Lake. In an emailed statement, the environment ministry says it also witnessed the tailings pond effluent being discharged into Hazeltine Creek during an inspection Sept. 4. The province says the mine has not discharged any more slurry into the creek since then and it has ordered the company not to do so in the future.Energy Minister Bill Bennett said he has authorized the company to start repairs so that the dam can hold back water resulting from the snow and ice thaw next spring. As much as two to three million cubic meters of water is expected, according to the company. “It doesn’t authorize them to reopen or begin to put tailings in that pond,” said Bennett. “That obviously would not happen until we have our investigation reports back. The government has three investigative reports due into the collapse, which could be done as early as January. Imperial Metals started rehabilitation and also guarded the disaster zone based on the local state of emergency. Many were outraged that they couldn't visit the disaster area. On Dec 4th the Cariboo Regional District (CRD) has rescinded the State of Local Emergency declared in Electoral Area F, the Likely Community Area.Imperial Metals does not believe it will make sense to remove sediment and tailings from the creek, an expensive proposition that the company says could create more damage. The company’s belief is predicated on its position that the tailings are relatively benign and will not produce acid that would release heavy metals into the environment. While the rock that has been milled in its mine does contain acid-generating pyrite, the acid-generating potential is neutralized by the significant amount of carbonate in the rock, says Robertson. “It’s the same thing when you think of your stomach acid and Tums. Well, we don’t have one Tums, we have a whole box of Tums — so it’s a very, very neutralizing environment,” he said.MPMC ordered 900 25kg bags of fast germinating grasses, which have been applied to exposed areas in an effort to provide vegetative cover. A specialty equipped helicopter was brought to the site to help with the task of seeding exposed areas. MPMC has seeded the entire TSF, which was previously covered by water, the exposed areas downstream of Polley Lake and throughout the Hazeltine Creek channel, except the canyon where the seeds would not be expected to germinate. While the fall season is approaching, we expect to get germination soon. The seeds have already started to germinated. We will monitor the seeded areas follow the progress of the vegetative cover. A pic near Likely around xmas, since turnover the water has been cloudy.Premier Christy Clark: "Things looked bleak in Likely when the Mount Polley tailing dam breached. This was a tragedy – one I am determined to make sure is never repeated. But the response, bringing together my team with the Cariboo Regional District, local First Nations, and residents, showed what we can do when we work together to get a community back on its feet."Williams Lake has been through some ups and downs. But the work ethic, perseverance and spirit of its people will be on display to the world again when the second season of Timber Kings hits HGTV, reaching millions of viewers. And odds are good Stampede will set another attendance record next summer."An expert panel examining the disaster received a 47-page UVic law centre report — entitled Not an Act of God which raises concerns about the role of government oversight and the B.C. government’s reliance on professionals who are employed by the mine to conduct inspections. The report, authored by UVic law students, said it was important the panel “recognize that engineering design, mining operations and regulatory oversight issues are not merely questions of physical causation but occur within a legal and regulatory context that govern behaviour.” The report said a key problem is the B.C. government relies on the expertise and diligence of professional engineers to inspect and report, but gives them no power or authority to require that the mining operation make changes. The report said the problem is compounded by a lack of timely followup by government. It pointed to the lack of action on fixing dam instrumentation and problems with dam construction at Mount Polley raised in inspection reports between 2008 and 2010. “There needs to be a legally effective mechanism for these recommendations to be followed; failure to do so should have a legal consequence and should be considered non-compliance,” said the report. The UVic law centre recommended following the example of oversight at contaminated sights, where a roster of qualified people appointed by government, and at arm’s length of the companies, conduct inspections and reports. Edited January 14, 2015 by scuro2
spincast Posted January 11, 2015 Report Posted January 11, 2015 spectacular fishing and scenery! the colours on those fish are fantastic A complete travesty, the damage and loss to the environment. Hopefully time will eventually undo what greed and willful ignorance has damaged in a few brief moments
bigugli Posted January 11, 2015 Report Posted January 11, 2015 The lake and surrounding area might recover fully in 50-60 years, assuming there won't be any more blunders. It would also require the province getting off it's arse and doing something constructive. That is not going to happen.
Fishwilly Posted January 12, 2015 Report Posted January 12, 2015 Beautiful fish and scenery. Second part not so nice.....nothing but corporate greed. It's always about the almighty dollar !! What a shame.
moxie Posted January 12, 2015 Report Posted January 12, 2015 Great fishing report and pics. The second part of the story is becoming far to common these days as politicians show conspiring to hold and/or maintain power and the consequences associated with those decisions. Thanks for sharing.
Nipfisher Posted January 12, 2015 Report Posted January 12, 2015 Shameful. I have been up that way a couple of times as my father lives in Burnaby and has friends in 100 Mile House.
spincast Posted January 12, 2015 Report Posted January 12, 2015 and it only gets worse when it comes to admitting the error....http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/nafta-scrutiny-of-oilsands-tailings-ponds-opposed-by-canada-1.2896100
RDR Posted January 12, 2015 Report Posted January 12, 2015 Nice report scuro! Beyond sad, best describes what has happened there. I spent some time in the early 80's in that exact area. A great part of "OUR" country has been lost and who in government or business really gives a damn? Very bad news for every living thing in that once beautiful area....... Thanks for taking the time to share the before and after. Those are some beauty fish!!!
scuro2 Posted January 13, 2015 Author Report Posted January 13, 2015 (edited) First off...this was bad but may be not as bad as some of you think. The few fish that died with the spill probably didn't die of the toxins within the tailings pond. They were not in liquid form but rather in a naturalized form...more further down.I am giving some thought to visiting the lake again this summer to support that community but also to see for myself how things are. Luckily the spill into Lake Quesnel was near the outflowof the lake. Still, who knows what percentage of contaminants have been washed down the Fraser river. What is know is that large a plume was sitting well under the surface of lake and now is finally clearly visible with lake turnover. I'm sure that those in charge were counting on most of it to be sucked down river before appropriate water testing was put into place and they probably thought their plan was a success...out of sight out of mind. But as the good fishermen amongst you know, underwater wind currents do the exact opposite of what you think they will do.The toxins are in a neutral and natural form within particles some being smaller then bacteria...floating throughout the water column and who knows how far up this 100 km lake. What happens when those particles enter gills or your stomach? What happens when plants absorb them? Who can state anything with certainty? My brother who is hydrologist agrees that this is like a huge science experiment without a thesis statement. My guess is that next summer things will be a lot like they were this summer except there will be less tourists. Perhaps you will see the odd cloudy plume. From the lake Hazeltine creek may even look normal to the outsider. Personally I don't think I'll living off of fish for my week visit or chugging lake water.One thing that should have never have happened was the BULL offered up by the company and the MoE. Get in front of the problem honestly so that the public sees that you as trustworthy. Do your best to fully acknowledge the problem by being totally transparent and getting the best people in to assess if your people don't have the skills. Then solve it to the best of your ability. Too late for that now and the end result is a divided community with what appears to be a "move-on" "pro-mine" majority and a minority who rightly has no trust in those in charge and wants real answers. As we have already seen Imperial Metals states it is afraid to remove the contaminants along the creek and on the lake bottom. Personally I believe that is because it will cost tens to hundreds of millions of dollars to do a good job. Luckily there are a few outside players like a UBC research station on the lake who may offer to be a voice of reason/authority/trustworthiness. Edited January 14, 2015 by scuro2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now