spinnerbaitking Posted March 21, 2012 Report Posted March 21, 2012 (edited) Hey Guys & Gals Found this on another site posted by someone very respected in the Industry, thought I'd pass it along, I posted it on my Facebook, Twitter & sent a letter to my local Conservative MP Ben Lobb & the Minister Of Fisheries & Oceans Canada keith.ashfield@parl.gc.ca , just takes a minute to sign the petition Thanx & Tight Lines SBK Hello Fellow Anglers, Please take time to read the outline below. Please consider signing the petition as well. If you really enjoy the quality of fish and fish habitat we have in Canada you will consider signing this peitition. Thank you, Jason LINK: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/124/389/037/keep-protection-of-habitat-in-the-canada-fisheries-act/ Additional Information: Target: Keith Ashfield, Minister of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada Sponsored by: Douglas Channel Watch URGENT! We need to deliver this petition prior to the federal budget release on March 29, 2012! The federal conservative government is proposing to eliminate fish habitat protection measures from the Fisheries Act! This is a systematic dismantling of fundamental environmental protection,and will allow the government to push through large projects that have clear and imminent negative impact on fish bearing waterways all acrossCanada (eg. Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline proposal). This change will not only harm fish and fish habitat but it will threaten commercial and sport fisheries, ecotourism and our iconic salmon. A retired federal government aquatic ecologist, Otto Langer has disclosed leaked information about the conservative's plan to sneak severe changes to the Fisheries Act through the omnibus budget bill on March 29, 2012.These changes, if imposed, will be done with zero public consultation and zero consultation with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. An excerpt from Langer's letter: ``The government is totally re-writing the habitat protection provisions of Section 35(1) so as to remove habitat protection out of the Fisheries Act. This is a serious situation and will put Canada back to where we were in the pre-1976 period where Canada had no laws to protect fish habitat and no way to monitor the great industrial expansion that occurred in Canada with the consequential loss of major fish habitat all across Canada.` We cannot let this happen! Sign this petition to tell Keith Ashfield, Minister of the Fisheries and Oceans, that you demand fish habitat protection remains an integral and key provision in the Fisheries Act and as citizen of this country, you insist on a democratic process involving all stakeholders prior to any future changes to this act. This is very urgent. The more signatures, the louder our collective voice! Please share widely. Thank you. More information: To view Biologist Otto Langer`s full 3 page letter, visit: http://blogs.canada.com/2012/03/13/are-tories-secretly-rewriting-the-rules-on-protecting-fish-habitat/ Edited March 21, 2012 by spinnerbaitking
DRIFTER_016 Posted March 21, 2012 Report Posted March 21, 2012 Done deal!!!! Sent off to our MP for the NWT as well.
Rod Caster Posted March 21, 2012 Report Posted March 21, 2012 I emailed Jay Aspin a few weeks ago. I'll forward this as well. Thanks
torco Posted March 21, 2012 Report Posted March 21, 2012 signed the petition, is there a form letter I can shoot to my MP? I will send my own if need be but thought I would check first.
troutologist Posted March 21, 2012 Report Posted March 21, 2012 I have written and pestered my MP via telephone. Lets put the conservation in conservative!!!
Guest ThisPlaceSucks Posted March 21, 2012 Report Posted March 21, 2012 (edited) http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/03/21/budget-environmental-cp.html Next week's budget will propose a streamlined environmental assessment process, something that will delight the oil patch and give provinces a larger say over resource development. But one part under consideration for the package — reforms to the Fisheries Act that would end federal oversight over much of the country's fresh water — is proving difficult for some provinces to swallow, sources say. The environmental changes will be pitched as part of a major theme of the budget: get government out of the way and let corporations flourish. They will reflect commitments made increasingly frequently by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his environment and natural resource ministers, to remove barriers to investment and development. Specific legislative amendments and regulatory fixes will likely be introduced later, with the budget merely outlining the new direction. The package will eventually see Ottawa pay far less attention to small projects, impose time limits on major environmental hearings and pull out of the process altogether if a province is ready to step in with similar standards. Economic impact "Clearly, we need to focus our attention and reviews where they really matter — on big projects with the potential for the greatest economic and environmental impact," Natural Resource Minister Joe Oliver said Tuesday in Saskatchewan. Plus, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency will likely cede ground in some areas to the National Energy Board and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, to eliminate overlap. At stake, says Oliver, is $500 billion in new energy and mining investment over the next 10 years. Ottawa has shopped these ideas around to the provinces and there has been general, widespread agreement that the environmental assessment process is arcane, archaic and needs reform. "I'm happy to say that my provincial and territorial counterparts… agree that our goal should be one project, one review, completed in a clearly defined time period," Oliver said Tuesday. The oilpatch will stand to benefit, in particular, since changes made in the past to expedite hearings mainly benefited the mining industry, but did not directly tackle the panels often faced by oilsands projects. 'Reset the clock' "I'm encouraged by the current thrust toward regulatory reform," said Don Thompson, an executive adviser at Canadian Oil Sands Ltd. "It's time to clean it up and reset the clock for the current decade." At the same time, funding for the major projects management office — a group of federal deputy ministers whose task is to push assessments through the system efficiently — is expected to be renewed in the budget. It was set to expire this year. It's trickier, however, to tinker with the Fisheries Act. A leaked draft of one proposal last week showed Ottawa wants to remove habitat provisions from the act, essentially diluting the federal government's oversight of fresh water in the face of industrial development. Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield insists no final decision has been made, but says current policies overreach and are under review to better reflect "the priorities of Canadians." His office will give no details about what policies are under review, when the review will be completed, or whether it plans to consult provincial governments and other stakeholders. Pick up slack Environmentalists and a large network of environmental scientists are furious about the idea and say Ottawa is ready to abdicate its national and international obligations to protect waterways. Provinces would likely be expected to pick up the slack, but they are in the dark about how that would work and don't appreciate being handed extra cost and responsibility, some insiders said. "If this approach is taken, groups such as ours will press the province to address the protection of aquatic habitat in legislation such as the proposed provincial water act," the B.C. Wildlife Federation said in a recent letter to Harper. The federation said a mosaic of habitat regulations is a bad idea. The Fisheries Act's habitat provisions are a frequent trigger for government intervention in the development of natural resources, partly because Canada has so many waterways that it's rare to find a mine or project that does not encompass a stream. Pressure over Fisheries Act Mining companies complain that government officials have cracked down in recent years for no apparent reason, hindering their work. Industry groups in British Columbia have pressured Ottawa for years to change the Fisheries Act so that it doesn't micro-manage minor developments. "I think the focus needs to be on preservation of key fisheries stock," said Thompson of Canadian Oil Sands. The federal measures come as a bitter war of words between environmentalists and the government takes full flight. Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver has condemned "radical" environmentalists, accusing them of taking foreign money to undermine Canada's economic health by opposing the Northern Gateway pipeline proposal. Environmentalists, for their part, accuse Ottawa of giving up stewardship of the environment to promote energy and mining projects at all costs. Edited March 21, 2012 by Dr. Salvelinus
Garfisher Posted March 21, 2012 Report Posted March 21, 2012 http://www.gazette.gc.ca/consult/consult-eng.html#i1 This site is where you can also put in some input as well on this, as it goes directly to the government. I would suggest using this instead of petitions, theres probably many petitions already against this possible change, and having one source with many names compared to many petitions with a couple hundred signatures would probably be more helpful to the cause. It isn't up there yet, but it certainly will when it's introduced to Parliament.
The Urban Fisherman Posted March 22, 2012 Report Posted March 22, 2012 A decent article I came across this morning... http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Local/2012-03-22/article-2936510/Wave-of-opposition-to-possible-Fisheries-Act-changes/1
Guest ThisPlaceSucks Posted March 22, 2012 Report Posted March 22, 2012 (edited) A decent article I came across this morning... http://www.thetelegram.com/News/Local/2012-03-22/article-2936510/Wave-of-opposition-to-possible-Fisheries-Act-changes/1 that really puts the arrogance of the conservatives into perspective... they make changes to DFO legislation against the wishes of the experts in the field... not unlike making changes to criminal justice legislation against the will of the experts... and so on, and so on... this isn't a government, it's a terrorist group. Edited March 22, 2012 by Dr. Salvelinus
troutologist Posted March 22, 2012 Report Posted March 22, 2012 (edited) Here is a link to the letter that 624 scientists wrote to the PM Letter....this is an issue folks push back! Edited March 22, 2012 by Jay Hamilton
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now