Terry

that's good news

well that explains why he didn't catch fish you can't go wrong with a wally diver ...female dog but the other name for them....LOL........

but guess I have to.....

I think as long as the hunter tells the person they are interfering with a legal hunt and to leave. anything beyond that point is a violation and can and should be charged

can't wait

Freemasons of the world unite

my how time flies, going south already have a good winter....

there is a member of this website that had a one man pak-a-shelter, not sure of the make, looked good I think it lasted about 2 days on the ice and was trash

I thought that only topo and street maps work with that one, but who knows

is it like this

nice going

it was some years ago, bob shot the show there, I went to beauchene wanting to get into some of the same bass and that is what the owner told me and others. we were pissed about it at the time....and I see no reason for the owner to lie but of course he could and I say again, strait up that that is indeed what he told me....... you could ask Lonnie King, he was there (guiding I think) that year, he might know, or not...LOL

but..... the owners of la reserve beauchene told me, bob did fish a lake there before the lake was open for bass for his fishing show and that there was no use me going to the lake during bass season, as the fish move and are hard to find after they spawn and the season is open.. so he like many others have did it

he made a good living and we are still paying for the stupid spending he did and lets not forget Rae Days............ he had great ideas but not a clue on how to pay for his programs

they would make some nice hats LOL

so Brian gets the deer and Stan get a piece of tail did I get that right a lot of hunters have friends who want feathers and pelts

funny

welcome back

good maybe news of this will stop other stupid people from harassing us

you need to be a member of OFSC to ride an ATV on what little trails SC still has open to ATVs

oh yeah, it's true New recreational policy calls for O.F.A.H. membership when hunting in Simcoe County Forest The County of Simcoe considers hunting to be a heritage activity within it's County forests and to help ensure it continues along with all other recreational uses, County Council has introduced a new recreational use policy. Among other conditions, the policy calls for anyone hunting in Simcoe County Forests to be a member of the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters. Simcoe County and its nearly 31,000 acres of forest properties welcomes outdoor enthusiasts of all kinds. With 150 forest tracks stretching across 16 municipalities, Simcoe County Forests provide significant outdoor getaways north of Toronto. Since 1922 . yeah paying for a membership is going to make hunting simcoe county safer.......can you say money grab

to me hockey is the toronto maple leafs my hockey team isn't there anymore, so I quit watching/following hockey most teams are owned by rich children who want the glory of a team and will pay big buck to make a winning team the leafs are owned by the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan and they are there to make money, bottom line nothing else matters to them they sell out the seats each year, they know they don't need a winning team to make the big profits so yeah we need to get new owners...that will only happen when the start to lose money or we need to boycott the leafs totally, the games, the tv, everything email companies that buy season tickets and tell them you will boycott their produces if they buy the seats and what not and like that will ever happen so, hockey is not in my vocabulary anymore...a tear runs down my cheek............

wow one pair of socks for life do I have to remove the socks to clean them now and then or can I just keep them on LOL

cooks bay the 18th works for me that's when I start my xmas vacation

I have mixed feelings about this one maybe the gov. can set out a legal distance to stay away from duck hunters.. and I would think first one on site gets to use the area.. bottom line, man with gun wins argument