craigdritchie

OP has it right - if the Ontario Liberals are involved, it will be a colossal failure. LCBO will be the only dope dealer in the world to not make a profit.

Forget the name on the headstock and buy what feels good in your hands. I once splurged on a Martin D-35 ... it sounded amazing, but I hardly ever picked it up because it just wasn't comfortable to play. I replaced it with a Ovation that cost half as much, which I still own and play all the time. I also have an old Washburn dreadnaught that sounds great and just melts into my hands. One thing I learned a long time ago is you can change the sound of any guitar to some degree by experimenting with different string brands, or going to lighter or heavier gauge strings. But if it isn't comfortable, you won't play it - regardless of how it sounds, what it cost, or what it says on the headstock. Maybe that explains the $300 Yamaha sitting next to the $2,500 Fender in my basement. Love them both.

I guess you haven't seen this video then? https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10153817078765921

Call Tom Goodfellow ( Goodfellow Handyman Services, 905-802-0598, http://tomgoodfellow.typepad.com/blog). Tom's in Burlington but he travels throughout the west GTA. He charges something like $350 a day - not exactly cheap - and he might be booked up for a couple of weeks when you call. BUT ... there is a reason he is often booked up. Tom does first-class work, he's honest, he will treat your home with respect and not leave a mess after he's done, and he really does work his butt off - he doesn't slack off or decide he needs to go to Home Depot to get a part and bugger off for three hours. I've had Tom do electrical and plumbing work, and I cannot recommend the man highly enough. Cheers Craig

The government can't do anything about it, since virtually all of these calls come from people in India, Indonesia, Pakistan and other countries that don't aggressively enforce laws concerning fraud. Get a phone with call display if you don't already have it. If you don't recognize the number, don't even answer it. If it's a real call, they will leave a message and you can phone them back.

That call was not from CTC, Cliff. You were talking to a thief, calling you from somewhere on the other side of the globe. They might also tell you that you've won a prize of some sort, and they just need your credit card info to confirm your ID. Don't ever give them any information. Nothing. Just hang up. It's not even worth telling them off.

Nice boats, but we'll have to see what the future holds. Last week PolarKraft was sold to Bennington Marine, along with six other boat brands that used to make up Nautic Global Group (the other makes are Rinker, Hurricane, SanPan, Sweetwater, Godfrey and Aqua Patio). Since Bennington Marine only makes pontoons, it's not clear if they will keep them all, or just keep the pontoon brands and re-sell PolarKraft and Rinker to someone else. Guess we'll find out soon enough.

That - right there - is the entire problem with the Atlantic salmon program. It no longer has anything to do with fish. It is 100% about keeping the money rolling in.

Blah blah blah. None of this answers the fundamental question. We stock about a half-million chinook into Lake Ontario each year. The lake is full of them. Going out and catching a dozen chinook a day is not unusual at all. We also stock about a half-million Atlantics into Lake Ontario each year. Yet to this day, most anglers have still never even seen one. If the Atlantic salmon program is such a rip roaring success, where are all these fish?

Time for my annual prediction, and if you read my annual predictions over the past several years you will realize this is in no way influenced by the simple fact the Loafs got their backsides handed to them by the Habs last night. I predict: Loafs will be totally on fire in November and early December, when it doesn't really matter. In January they will start to slide, by February the excuses will be flying and fingers will be pointing, and by the end of March they will be booking tee times. But as always, they will be absolutely unbeatable for the last two weeks, climbing in the standings just enough to ensure they don't even get a good draft pick, and encouraging Loaf fans to all say wow, did you see them when they started to click? Next year, baby, next year! Plan the parade route! And that's all I have to say for this thread, See you all in April.

No idea Mike, since most other programs have worked out just fine as you note. Does anyone here remember the kokanee program of the late 1960s and very early 1970s? MNR stocked kokanee (small landlocked sockeye salmon) into Georgian Bay streams. The fish survived, and for a few years GB rivers like the Beaver were full of little, bright red,12-inch sockeyes. That was around the same time they began experiementing with pink salmon in Hudson Bay tributaries ( !! ) ... which led to them accidentally getting into Lake Superior. They failed in Husdon's Bay, but as we all know, pink salmon have established a large, wild population in Superior that exists to this day. JohnBacon is right in his comment that stocking the LeHav strain of Atlantic salmon is a complete waste of time. But that being the case, why has OMNR stuck with them for 30 years?? Heads should roll for that. MNR knows full well that Atlantic salmon are no longer suited to survive in Lake Ontario tributaries. In the 1990s, MNR performed several years worth of detailed experiments aimed to determine survival rates for Atlantic salmon fry that were stocked in various eastern Lake Ontario tributary streams. The studies found three things. 1. Atlantic survival was basically zero in streams with lots of silt, and with wood as their primary form of cover (i.e. more than 90% of available habitat in Lake Ontario tributaries). 2. Atlantic salmon survival was basically zero in any habitats where rainbow trout were also present. 3. Even in ideal, rock and gravel habitats with no rainbow trout present, survival rates were still minimal due to severe predation. The biologists determined that unlike rainbows, brook trout, brown trout and Pacific salmon, juvenile Atlantic salmon did not hide on the bottom of deep pools or under in-stream logs and undercut banks. Instead, they tended to sit right out in the open in shallow riffles, where they were subsequently eaten by virtually everything that lives in and along a creek - birds, other fish, water snakes, raccoons, you name it. Even in what the biologists considered to be ideal habitats, and where they did not face competition from rainbow trout, Atlantic salmon still amounted to little more than very expensive bird food. This was all well documented by the late 1990s. So why is MNR still beating a dead horse? If it's a matter of stocking the wrong strain of fish, why would they not have made a change over 20 years ago when it was clear this one isn't working out? Something smells. Happy to talk with you any time, Mike. Give me a call on my cell at your convenience.

Then why not just spend the money directly ON habitat rehabilitation, and stop wasting it on raising and stocking fish that only seem to exist on paper? There's no benefit to creating false expectations. There will be even less money for any kind of fisheries management efforts when this one doesn't produce the results that have been promised. Corporate donors (like that Australian winery) won't appreciate being told they're "bringing back the salmon" when, in fact, there is virtually no chance of that ever really happening. No offense, but I have been hearing that load of crap since they started stocking Atlantics in 1985. No, success doesn't happen overnight. But it shouldn't take 30 years either. OMNR began stocking coho salmon into the Credit River (>100,000 fish) in spring 1968. By fall 1969, they had large runs (3,000+) in the Credit and Humber Rivers. That didn't take 30 years to see any results. It took 18 months. OMNR started stocking rainbows into the Ganaraska in large numbers (100,000 fish/yr) in the early 1970s. By the late 1970s, they had 10,000+ fish going over Corbett Dam each spring. By the early '80s, they were over 15,000 fish. That didn't take 30 years to see any results. It took less than six years. OMNR stocked their first chinook salmon into Bronte Creek in 1974 (100,000 fish). By 1978, Bronte Creek was choked with adult chinooks every fall. That didn't take 30 years to see any results. It took three years to see large returns of jacks, and only another 12 months to see big returns of adults. Consider it this way ... If we began stocking 500,000 chinook/yr into the Credit River, within three to four years you will see enormous runs of adult chinook. No one doubts this for a second. If we began stocking 500,000 rainbows/yr into any river, within 18 months you will see catchable fish and within three years you will have massive runs of fish. No one doubts this either. If we stocked 500,000 browns (I wish!!) into the Credit or Humber, you would be walking on the things within two years. Yet for years we have been stocking 500,000 Atlantics into the Credit every spring, and we have maybe 30 fish per year (and this year, apparently just two grilse) to show for it? Look man, I am patient. But even I have my limits.

I think the all-time record might be something like 51 fish going through the ladder, from stocking something like a half-million per year. Then it dropped to about 30-ish. And so far, you say only two this year? Sounds about right. Since they began stocking Atlantics into Lake Ontario in the mid-1980s, I can count the number I've caught on one hand. Just a fantastic return on investment. LOL ... given the survival rate, it seems like a lot of other things like eating them too. Atlantic salmon = very expensive fish food.

Atlantic salmon ... yeah, there's a laugh. Stock a half-million each year so that 30 show up at the ladder. Great program, let's go with it.

ALL newspapers, virtually all radio stations and television stations, and a huge proportion of news websites are partisan to one degree or another. They all exist to present the news in a way that flatters the party they are aligned with, and make the other parties look horrible. If you read coverage of the same event in the Star, Sun and National Post, you would think you were reading about three different things. For example, consider the headlines on each of these papers if they had to report on the Titanic sinking: Toronto Star - Conservative Budget Cuts Leave Hundreds Dead Off Newfoundland National Post - Cancellation of Coast Guard Ships By Liberals Leaves Hundreds Dead Off Newfoundland Toronto Sun - Giant Wet T-Shirt Contest !!!

I'm of two minds where carpet goes. On one hand I agree with Steve, I like the extra traction, especially once you get some slime on the deck. But it holds water like a sponge, and it never really comes clean. I like the durability of vinyl, but it can get pretty slippery after you've put a couple of fish on it, especially if you're fishing for lakers or pike. Has anyone tried using snap-in carpet on their fishing boat? I know it's very popular on runabouts and bowriders ... the carpet attaches to the floor on a series on metal snaps, so you can haul it out in a few seconds to dry the boat out after a rain, or to give it a thorough cleaning at the end of the year. And once it gets really badly chewed up, it's a lot less fuss to replace than a traditional glued-in carpet floor. It seems like a good alternative for a fishing boat. Anyone have any practical experience with it on a fishing rig?

It is also important to remember that the Toronto Star has long ties to the LIberal party. They will make a fuss over anything that makes an opponent of the LIberals look bad. (It's not just the Star. All newspapers have ties to different political parties. Most newspapers were created to present the news so it flattered the party they were associated with).

At the end of the day I think most Canadians want to help those in need. Our country has a long history fo doing more than its share. That's part of what makes Canada such a great place to live. But maybe because I am a bit old school, I believe we must do things the right way, and not just go with knee-jerk reactions. While it's nice to roll out the welcome wagon, I would like to know exactly who it is that is coming into my country. There are countless news clips on the internet showing all sorts of debris left behind by migrants passing through Hungary ... including Pakistani passports, Iranian passports, paperwork belonging to people from Sri Lanka and Bangladesh ... none of these people are Syrian refugees. Yet they're running across the borders into Europe, and no one has any idea who they are or where they came from. How does anyone know that at least some of these people are not terrorists connected with ISIS or Al Queda? The truth is, no one has any clue. While Mr Trudeau and Mr Mulcair might be all for opening our borders and giving these new arrivals housing and health care and all sorts of other free gifts just for showing up, I would rather we go about this is a proper way, confirm that the people we allow in are, in fact, Syrian refugees in the first place, then let them go through the same system as everyone else. That's more than fair. What truly disgusts me in all of this is how both Trudeau and Mulcair are using this issue, and particularly a photo of some dead kid on a beach, to try and win brownie points in an election. It's pathetic, it's desperate, and it is utterly despicable. Instead of campaigning on the back of a dead child, I would prefer if they would get back to talking about real issues like the economy, developing international trade, and positioning Canada for prosperity in the coming years. Political rant over and out.

"Old stock" refers to Canadians. The context of the comment was in reply to Mulcair and Trudeau insisting Canada must do more to help migrants from Syria by bringing them here, setting them up with housing, etc. Harper said he didn't think any new refugees coming in should be entitled to get anything from the government more than what Canadian citizens get. He shot himself in the foot in how he phrased it, but the basic answer - saying everyone should be treated the same way - is something I support. Why should someone who has been in the country for five minutes be entitled to things I am not, when I have paid taxes here my whole life?

Don't take the fitting off the tank. Use an adapter hose that has a Merc connection at one end and Johnson at the other. Scepter Canada sells a wide range of fuel line fittings and fuel line adapters. Most marine stores have them.

Most likely the owner replaced an I/O with an outboard. Many advantages to this - outboards generally weigh much less than an I/O of equal power, so you get a better power/weight ratio ... modern outboards give better fuel economy than I/Os ... you can tilt the outboard completely out of the water to keep crud , zebra mussels and (in salt water) barnacles out of it ... and moving the prop aft of the transom gives it more leverage, so you have greater speed and much better handling. Brackets aren't just for repowering though, you do see them more and more on new boats - especially big salt water rigs. Disadvantages to brackets are that they can be awkward when using downriggers, and they require the transom to be reinforced, since you're hanging the engine's full weight out on the end of it. If you use one, you'll probably have to replace your prop as well (pitch will be off) and the engine height is critical. Most brackets are installed with jack plates as a result. Armstrong are probably the biggest bracket maker out there. You can find more info on their website.

Nothing wrong with a Legend, but as others have said, they compete on price by advertising the boat with a smaller engine. By the time you upgrade to a larger engine, the price tends to fall in line with everyone else. What would I buy? Starcraft - hands down. Don't even have a second choice. They're well designed, well built, nothing rattles or vibrates, and they're just about indestructable. The Hydra-Lift hull design on most of the fishing models will go into shallow water for bass, yet still eat big waves i open water. That's why so many of the die-hard walleye guys on Erie use them. Beyond that, Starcraft has been building boats since 1903. You don't stay in any business for 112 years (and counting) by making a crappy product, or by not taking care of your customers.

Not sure how things are in your neck of the woods Cliff, but around here, it is a very small number of real estate agents who seem to do at least 90 percent of the sales. They're the ones who really work it, and they're the ones you will likely have the most success with. Find out who they are, talk to a couple of them and find one you're comfortable with. Then, it's a lot easier. They're not all turkeys. By the way, it's important to understand that "what the house is worth" and "what the house will sell for" are two completely different things. The appraised value might not be even close to its realistic market price. The reality is that many homes have very expensive features in them that simply won't factor into their resale value (things like the additional insulation in your boat house, although valuable, might fall into this area). Comparisons to the actual selling prices of similar homes in your area is a much more accurate guide.

McGuard makes prop locks for various outboards and stern drives. Same company that makes locking nuts for cars. Most larger marine parts stores will have them in stock - especially now, with winter storage coming up.

Internet Explorer has so many security flaws in it that you really should replace it with anything else. Seriously.