Absolutely correct. It's ok not to understand hockey (or like it for that matter) and I chose my words poorly.
What I meant to convey was that those people, who by birth alone think they know hockey, should not run their mouths about something they do not understand.
Funny how we all have our price point. Livetarget is about my max price wise, but if I'm buying a lure that I deem "bass specific" my price point comes down. I guess I don't see bass being as finicky or tough to catch as walleye or trout. (Not saying I'm right, just the way I feel)
Sure they work… Anglers have been buying them for years.
Seriously they are a quality lure that are comparable price-wise to other name brand cranks. They might be more detailed then necessary for most situations but in clear water that might just be the difference that's puts a fish on the line.
You play low skill teams that collapse to the net and the forwards get clogged up and the D-men are open. It won't be any different against the Swiss (or Latvia) but it will be against the Russians and Sweedes. The US doesn't have the skill either but they hate (and don't) play the try not to lose game. Canada is the best team, but the best teams don't always win one-and-done tournaments.
^That^ was the one that they couldn't use anymore because the leaf was a brand logo. Hockey Canada made a bit of a stink about it, even though they knew all along that they would benefit from the new sales.
I'm not a fan of any of the three, although to be fair I didn't like the 2010 uniforms either. It's not about a good design, just different, to sell a new set to fans.
I liked this one:
Both have durability has the main selling feature. I'd hold them both and see which is lighter and feels more sensitive. I would also not rule out some other rods.