fishing n autograph Posted August 9, 2011 Report Posted August 9, 2011 (edited) Sugar coat it all you want. Its still excessive consumption. I see no need to get drunk to see if a breathalyser works. You blow in it and it gives you a reading. 0 is as good a reading as .05 and a lot safer. The centre for forensic sciences still falls under the labour code and they got you impaired at work, therefore sanctioned by your employer. i'd hate to see what you'd say about the more in depth courses for drugs and vice and forensic ident lol what do you think about the body farm in virginia where they purposely bury bodies to study decomposition Edited August 9, 2011 by FishnNAutographs
dave524 Posted August 9, 2011 Report Posted August 9, 2011 So what have I learned in reading 4 pages ? If I extend the dock all the way out to the icefishing shack in winter I can drink legally in the shack
Dara Posted August 9, 2011 Report Posted August 9, 2011 The Center for Fornsic sciences???, no doctors or scientists present???? Give your head a shake. By your logic then, we should cancel all science experiments that take place in High School or college because the results are known. As for being drunk on the job, as part of a training excercise, that is just normal procedure in training someone to enforce our laws. I suppose you feel that firearms training should be done with a pointed finger and the officer yelling "bang" rather than using live ammunition as well. Give your head a shake...how bout they put a bullet in his leg so he knows what its like to get shot. My point is that HEALTH CANADA recomends limiting alcohol intake to no more that 2 drinks per day for safety reasons. Why should it then not be illegal to have more than 2 per day, you know, just to keep us safe from our own stupidity.
Spiel Posted August 9, 2011 Report Posted August 9, 2011 Is it raining across the entire province? Same old folks spinning their tires and going nowhere!
Recommended Posts