wkrp Posted August 5, 2008 Report Posted August 5, 2008 I am in the market for a new fishfinder and have narrowed my choices to the Eagle Fishmark 480 - Lowrance X125 - Lowrance X135. The Sonar Output Power of these units is 1500W, 2400W and 4000W respectively. Is it worth the extra cost for the extra output power and what is the advantage other than a greater sonar depth capability?
Raf Posted August 5, 2008 Report Posted August 5, 2008 where/what do you fish? if you're mainly fishing shallow water species the eagle will be plenty. if you are a great lakes salmon troller, i'd consider the x125/x135.
Roy Posted August 5, 2008 Report Posted August 5, 2008 I wouldn't go with anything under 4,000w. Not so much for the depth but for the clarity of the signal. Within a couple of years I doubt you'll be able to find a unit under 4,000 watts.
Uncle Buck Posted August 5, 2008 Report Posted August 5, 2008 ask anyone who owns a vexilar... LOL one Vex owner told me that my 2000W Marcum will fry a fishes brain... LOL buy the additional wattage and don't regret it...
Greencoachdog Posted August 5, 2008 Report Posted August 5, 2008 I wouldn't go with anything less than a 2400 watt. I stepped up from a 2400 to a 4000 watt unit and can't tell that much difference, but I fish relatively shallow water. I think another important question you need to ask yourself is what kind of transducer do you want. I stepped down from a triple beam transducer to a dual beam transducer and don't like it as much, I'll be purchasing the quadruple beam transducer here shortly. Dual beams are good for deep water fishing (100' and deeper), but for less than 100' i like a triple or quadruple beam. Hope this helps!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now