Jump to content

Troubling DNA results


spincast

Recommended Posts

saw this post on another forum - be nice if we could find a solution for this problem before its too late

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

July 13, 2012

 

 

 

Media Contacts

 

Michigan DNR: Jim Dexter 517-373-3375, Debbie Munson Badini 906-226-1352

 

Ohio DNR: Rich Carter 614-565-8910, Bethany McCorkle 614-406-2011

 

 

 

 

 

Six Lake Erie water samples test positive for Asian carp eDNA

 

Michigan and Ohio DNRs planning follow-up actions with partner agencies

 

 

 

Federal and state wildlife officials working in conjunction with academic researchers today announced six water samples taken from Sandusky and north Maumee bays tested positive for the presence of Asian carp environmental DNA in Michigan and Ohio waters.

 

 

 

The positive samples were among 417 taken from Lake Erie in August 2011, and more than 2,000 samples taken from the Great Lakes Basin since 2010. The Lake Erie batch was recently analyzed and test results were confirmed by eDNA researchers this week. The six positive samples represent less than 1.5 percent of the Lake Erie samples.

 

 

 

Four samples from Sandusky Bay, in Ohio waters, tested positive for bighead carp eDNA, while two samples from north Maumee Bay, in Michigan waters, were positive for silver carp eDNA.

 

 

 

In response to these findings, electro-shocking and netting began Friday in Sandusky Bay with no evidence of Asian carp found. However, additional testing and monitoring are planned by the Ohio and Michigan Departments of Natural Resources in conjunction with partner agencies.

 

 

 

The findings indicate the presence of genetic material left behind by the species, such as scales, excrement or mucous, but not the establishment of Asian carp in Lake Erie. Positive eDNA tests are regarded by the scientific community as an indicator of the species' recent presence, however, positive results can occur whether the organism was alive or dead.

 

 

 

While the eDNA findings suggest the possible presence of the invasive species, officials have no physical evidence the fish have migrated to the Great Lakes. Prior to 2003, three individual bighead carp were collected in Lake Erie. No additional observations have been reported during the past decade.

 

 

 

"The results from these water samples are certainly concerning, as this marks the first time Asian carp eDNA has been detected in water samples from Lake Erie, or any of the Michigan waters intensively surveyed for the presence of invasive carp," said Michigan DNR Fisheries Division Chief Jim Dexter. "Protecting the Great Lakes from the threat of Asian carp is critical to the health of our sport and commercial fisheries and to the quality of life in Michigan. We are actively engaged in Asian carp surveillance programs throughout the Great Lakes, including Lake St. Clair and Lake Erie, and the Department stands ready to take the necessary and appropriate actions to investigate and respond to these test results."

 

 

 

In response to the positive test results, officials from the Michigan and Ohio DNRs, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and White House Council on Environmental Quality are developing a plan of action in collaboration with the eDNA research team to obtain follow-up samples and test results as quickly as possible. Test results from future water samples will dictate the nature of further response methods.

 

 

 

"This lake is Ohio's greatest resource and our main objective is to keep it healthy," said Rich Carter, Ohio DNR's Executive Fish Management and Research Administrator. "The DNA findings have put Ohio fish and wildlife officers on high alert and marshaled our immediate action. In response to these findings, electro-shocking and netting in the identified areas of Sandusky Bay have already been completed and no Asian carp were found. Testing and monitoring will continue and we will work with Michigan and our other management partners to develop a coordinated approach to defining the status of Asian carp in Lake Erie."

 

 

 

Since 2010, the Michigan DNR, Ohio DNR, USFWS, University of Notre Dame, Central Michigan University and the Nature Conservancy have partnered to collect water samples from Great Lakes basin waters, including the Chicago Area Waterway System, southern Lake Michigan, western Lake Erie and tributary streams of lakes Michigan and Erie. The collaborative early-detection Asian carp surveillance program is funded by the USFWS with a federal Great Lakes Restoration Initiative grant, administered under the Asian Carp Control Strategy Framework.

 

 

 

Asian carp, including bighead and silver carp, pose a significant threat to the Great Lakes ecosystem and economy. Anglers are urged to become familiar with the identification of Asian carp, including both adults and juveniles, as the spread of juvenile Asian carp through the use of live bait buckets has been identified as a potential point of entry into Great Lakes waters.

 

 

 

A video demonstrating how to identify bighead and silver carp can be viewed on the USFWS YouTube channel at . Identification guides, frequently asked questions, management plans and an online reporting form are available online at www.michigan.gov/asiancarp and www.wildohio.com, or call 800-WILDLIFE.

 

 

 

The Michigan and Ohio Departments of Natural Resources are committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the region's natural and cultural resources for current and future generations.

 

 

 

###

 

Photo caption: Michelle Budny from the University of Notre Dame collects a water sample from Lake Erie for eDNA screening. Photo credit: Lindsay Chadderton, The Nature Conservancy.

 

 

 

Map information: Locations of Lake Erie water sample sites, with Asian carp eDNA positive locations marked in red (bighead carp) and orange (silver carp). Map credit: Sagar Mysorekar, The Nature Conservancy.

 

SOURCE: http://content.govde...gd/MIDNR-496f72

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting article, but based on the preliminary information above the results (6 positive tests) is not statistically significantly at a type 1 error rate of 5%, which is the usual test for significance in academic circles. This basically means that this could be a false positive, or a positive due to human error. Typically, a 5% error rate is used by academics to rule out natural variation, potential errors, cross contamination, etc. Since the article doesn't provide any level of significance or give an accuracy of the tests with a +/- percentage, it doesn't lend itself to be used as an indicator of the likelihood of asian carp presence.

 

Interesting read, but we need more information (from the DNR) about how the tests were conducted and whether the resulting observations are accurate, which at this point I highly doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recent Topics

    Popular Topics

    Upcoming Events


×
×
  • Create New...