JohnF Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 i agree... how do u leave off mike green??!?! Some of the hockey talking heads discussed that and made a good point. Does the team want goal scorers for defencemen or defencemen who can score goals. Green may not measure up in the defence department. I was a little surprised at Fleury ahead of Luongo but the guys picking the team have done their due diligence. JF
JohnF Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 mike green is such a offensive defenceman... imho, he wouldn't be able to handle it.... my only question is pronger.. on such a large ice surface why pick the slowest d'man out there... then again with all the talent out there.. no pick is really a wrong pick.. As much as I dislike Pronger he has some pretty solid credentials as an international player. I just hope he can resist the temptation to do something dirty and give our country's team a black eye. JF
ehg Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 If Canada picked a 2nd team, Just for the heck of it, picked Team B from leftover Canadian players Goaltenders Carey Price, Montreal Steve Mason, Columbus Marty Turco, Dallas Defencemen Dion Phaneuf, Calgary Jay Bouwmeester, Calgary Mike Green, Washington Brian Campbell, Chicago Sheldon Souray, Edmonton Kevin Bieska, Vancouver Tyler Myers, Buffalo Forwards Jeff Carter, Philadelphia Mike Smith, Ottawa Vincent Lecavalier, Tampa Simon Gagne, Philadelphia Martin St. Louis, Tampa Ryan Smyth, Los Angeles Micheal Cammalleri, Montreal Marc Savard, Boston Brad Richards, Dallas Nathan Horton, Florida John Tavares, New York Islanders Steve Stamkos, Tampa Still not a bad team for non-picks.
kickingfrog Posted December 31, 2009 Report Posted December 31, 2009 The roster was announced by position in alphabetical order, and while I'm sure the staff has some firm plans for depth, that doesn't have to be (and won't be) reviled until the games commence. The IOC requires them to announce the roster, I'm sure they would rather wait until closer to the games since there is no time to practise anyway.
ADB Posted January 1, 2010 Report Posted January 1, 2010 that's mighty cocky to say considering where we finished last olympics. on paper our team then was just as good. Many would argue that the team in 2006 was not nearly as good as the current team, but that's all subjective debate anyways. Canada won gold in 2002. The last time Russia won gold? 1988 in Calgary (as the Soviet Union) when it was amateurs playing. In the end, Canada is the favourite to win gold, and I'll take a bet from anyone who wants to disagree. Heck, I just bought the new Stradic CI4 on Boxing Day...I'd be willing to put that up if anyone wants to bet against our boys
lunkerbasshunter Posted January 1, 2010 Report Posted January 1, 2010 im shocked lecavier wasnt taken. I would of had stamkos on the team as well! I guess overall it doesnt really matter, the whole tourny comes down to the best goaltending. If marty plays well we will go a long way. Cheers!
kickingfrog Posted January 1, 2010 Report Posted January 1, 2010 Many would argue that the team in 2006 was not nearly as good as the current team, but that's all subjective debate anyways. Canada won gold in 2002. The last time Russia won gold? 1988 in Calgary (as the Soviet Union) when it was amateurs playing. In the end, Canada is the favourite to win gold, and I'll take a bet from anyone who wants to disagree. Heck, I just bought the new Stradic CI4 on Boxing Day...I'd be willing to put that up if anyone wants to bet against our boys In '92 the Gold was won by the team representing what was left of the crumbling USSR. Technically Russia has never won Olympic gold in mens hockey.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now