kickingfrog Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Article from the Globe and Mail... are we sure it's not just a new Berkley product??? http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/sto...ry/Science/home
Victor Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 haha "lungless frog" hmm ... deep-fried or bbq? lol
4thgen Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Quoted from the article: "Mr. Bickford said the species is the first frog known to science without lungs and joins a short list of amphibians with this unusual trait, including a few species of salamanders and a wormlike creature known as a caecilian." Unless by "a few species" of salamanders, he means about half (more than 250sp.) he is wrong. Sorry, just getting ready to write a herpetology final...
jonnybass Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Quoted from the article: "Mr. Bickford said the species is the first frog known to science without lungs and joins a short list of amphibians with this unusual trait, including a few species of salamanders and a wormlike creature known as a caecilian." Unless by "a few species" of salamanders, he means about half (more than 250sp.) he is wrong. Sorry, just getting ready to write a herpetology final... Semantics. (few, many, some, all, most, none, majority, minority of salamanders) Point being that this is the first frog ever discovered with this trait and is rare for amphibians, citing salamanders and caecilian as the rare exceptions.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now