I wouldnt say that HH. Its a horrible tragedy and I find no humour in the loss of lives, AT ALL.
And dutch, Im not "die hard constitutional guy".
My answer is no. He should not have been able to purchase these weapons IMO
Also, I dont live in the US so the outcome of gun legislation effects me in no way, shape or form. So Im just adding to the discussion.
I dont have an answer either.
All I know is that if you ban guns like australia, the body count is gonna be heaps and bounds above 49.
Also, I cannot understand this. He was visited and questioned numerous times by the FBI. How is his name not red flagged into a system of sorts barring him from legally obtaining a gun(s)?
Somewhere in here this is a rights/priveledge issue.