Rich Nelson

Chris and Sinclair... Did u miss this?

To me an explosion is an an explosion. Big or small. Evolutionism teaches that everything today is the result of a big explosion. Care to explain the difference, and how it ended up lookin like it is today?

.

The part where Jigger was saying " chemical makeup changing " threw me off. I now see the sarcasm . Lol So back to the building, and the bang...what was your point?

.?? Love and happiness are emotions and feelings. Lol.... No clue what u r getting at

Were all the molecules, and atoms etc ( Im not pretending to be scientist) destroyed? No. Whats your point? Your theory is saying that the obliterated pile of material can form on its own into something else ( even a living organism). So what could that pile possibly turn into? Besides dust and rock.

So now everyone that believes in the Bible, is Roman Catholic? Good to know

Lol. I wanna hear your answer! And reasoning.

False. ( might wanna look at a dictionary before you get back. ) WW2. All those pics are prob just photoshopped eh?

Thats not my understanding of the physical world. Sounds ridiculous right? Thats because it is. Makes about as much sense as the big bang theory. And I can say the exact same thing to you about my education, or parents teaching. Id rather be the guy that " believes" in something that makes sense, as oppossed to being taught some far fetched story about a big bang. Interesting how everyone keeps beating around the bush and changing the topic. Care to prove my points about evolution wrong, or have I made my point? And what exactly was this big explosion at the "beginning" anyway? If nothing is there, than nothing can explode. You made the post about 6000 years being a joke, so lets hear your theory.

Id watch what you say there Fisherman. Just because you dont agree with it makes everyone who is religious a "looser" ? You die, you rot, and return to the basic elements. And how can u possibly know that? What if the " religoius loosers" are right? Where would that leave you?

Im not sure what you are refering to here, but it has nothing to do with the discussion here about evolution or bigfoot. If you actually have something to add, then feel free.

The statement that Religion ( generalizing them all together) was created by man, is only a matter of opinion as Spiel stated. I agree with the rest.

I respect your opinion. And I also see how it sounds absurd. Im not going to post how I believe it all happened, because you already know the basics. ( i dont really need this to turn into a religion bashing seminar, which is what creationism is based on. Evolution is a theory, not a religion. If there are flaws in the Creation theory, then feel free to point them out. Im not a scientist, or Theologin, but I was given common sense, and the ability to reason. Take one small piece of the human body (eyes, fingers, etc anything) and see how intricate and complex they are. To think that they just became that way on their own as a result of some explosion... Well you know the drill. Im not expecting you to agree with me ( but I know there are more on the site that do). I think good discussion is healthy, ( and entertaining) Instead of just chiming in to say that Creationism is absurd, maybe you would like to look at my list of evolution myths, and point out where Im wrong....

So things change as they need to all on their own? Why is it that these days, the average life expectancy is far less than what it used to be? If natural selection only lets the strong survive, then we should all live to be hundreds if not thoasands of years old. Why arent we adapting to be superhumans? Still no scientific evidence supporting the theory. 1. The universe could not create itself out of nothing. ( logically speaking, from nothing comes nothing) 2. The law of thermodynamics tells us that a system will ALWAYS go from order to disorder unless there is a plan or outside intelligence to organize it. 3. Living things NEVER arise from non - living things. Evolution requires living things to come from nonliving, and this has never even been observed. 4.Complex systems do not evolve "bit by bit". " Its absurd to think that a complex organ like the human eye could be formed through natural processes." Charles Darwin ( even he realized how ridiculous the theory was. 5. Missing links are still missing. If evolution were true, there should be millions of intermediate fossil organisms present in the earth and the fossil record. For some odd reason, not one has ever been found ( or proven) 6. Mutations are contrary to Evolution. Natural selection cannot produce evolution, because its impossible to produce new genetic material. 7. Probability facts are contrary to Evolution. " the chance that life forms might have emerged this way ( time and chance) is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therin". (Evolutionist Sir Fred Hoyle) With all of todays technology, scientist cant find any crossover DNA? Eg no DNA of a mouse in a rabbit etc. Even if you dont look at the scientific evidence, the entire theory is insane and absurd, and goes against any sort of logic and order.

I agree that all man man structures would eventually "dissappear over time" but the evolution theory sais that that things appear and evolve over time. Thats a bit contradictory...

So if we leave the pile of rebar , cement and windows long enough, eventually it can rebuild itself, or turn into something better even. Ya, that seems logical and theres evidence of it happening all the time., Cmon.. Really? You cant actually admit that thats possible can you?

Yes, ive heard of carbon dating. It was invented in 1949. The theory that the earth is billions of years old has been around since the 1830s ( only based on evolution in the 1830s, with no technology or science backing it. So why in the 1830s did they think billions of years was no carbon dating to support the theory? Because they needed billions of years to hide behind or the theory of evolution would sound ridiculous...

"The deep understanding of nutrons is why we have smoke detectors" that tells me enough. And those with a deeper understanding have proven the earth to be 4.5 billion years old. Yet they cant prove it to the common guy because its all over our heads, and to scientific. Just theorys...

And , Im aware that some will think that the thought that the world was created by a higher power is just as ridiculous....just my opinion

Im guessing this will go in circles. But there is no proof that universe is millions of years old, or evolved on its own. ( just because a scientist claims something to be millions of years old without proof, doesnt make it true) I realize also that their is no scientific proof that the universe is 6000 years old, or created by a higher power. What scientists have proved so far, is that they havent found life outside of earth, so why is there anyreason to believe otherwise.(and why waste millions looking for something that isnt there?) The theory of the " Big Bang" just seems ludacris to me. One tiny neutron exploding, and eventually turning into the amazing world we live in today? I dont think so. When has an explosion ever "created" something as opposed to destroy something. If someone had a pile of wood , bricks, drywall, paint etc laying in a pile, and asked you if you believed they could turn it into a completed house by blowing up the materials with dynamite...What would you say? Obviously its impossible for that to happen, and you can agree with that. But you believe that the universe (which is billions of times more intricate and complex) could evolve that way. Doesnt really bother me what you believe, fact is lots havent really givin it much thought. I know its not going to change opinions, because a lot will " stick to their guns" without even paying attention to the ridiculous things they are saying.

If you actually believe that a so called scientist can inspect a rock or fossil, and tell you that its millions of years old, than I can see why you would be dilusional enough to believe in Bigfoot as well....

Ya, and?

Tail pinched for maximum length is the way the MNR recognizes length, and DNR in the US.