misfish

A what?

Awesome Wayne. Just got back from the field stand Look who visited this morning. The time is what makes the pic,s exciting. I think she likes the buck urine I used to cover my scent.

Very nice. That one will do. FM.

All I got to say is,open wheel dirt tracks.Knoxville. Good luck with what ever you decide Paul. Just besure to write.

If you launch out of Sibalds,there are some great shoals and shoreline spots for smallies. Get yourself a map.

Today it is.LOL

You lost me there. Im not talking vigilantes. Tell me,why do they have side arms? You just need people who care about the fishery. Our natural resources. All Im saying is,maybe it,s time for the MNR to branch out.

Give it time.

Getting an education and enjoying some fine angling. Good on ya. TFS

Since Im not all that smart,I looked it up,,,, Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies)[1] is a humorous observation made by Mike Godwin in 1990 which has become an Internet adage. It states: "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."[2][3] Godwin's Law is often cited in online discussions as a deterrent against the use of arguments in the widespread reductio ad Hitlerum form. The rule does not make any statement about whether any particular reference or comparison to Adolf Hitler or the Nazis might be appropriate, but only asserts that the likelihood of such a reference or comparison arising increases as the discussion progresses. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued,[4] that overuse of Nazi and Hitler comparisons should be avoided, because it robs the valid comparisons of their impact. Although in one of its early forms Godwin's Law referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions,[5] the law is now applied to any threaded online discussion: electronic mailing lists, message boards, chat rooms, and more recently blog comment threads, wiki talk pages, and Twitter. I think I understand.

Me personally,think the MNR should grant/deputize sr club members that take care of the restoration and stocking of these rivers,full blown authority,to lay charges.Yes even if it means giving the same outfits they wear. Vests guns,what ever it takes.VOLUNTEERS.

Yes,but we need the resources. All these fisher people and no CO,s to keep up.

LOL Misfit,someone got it right.LOL Dave,I fished the humber for almot 20 years,along with many other rivers back in the late 70,s and 80,s, and there are many places along the whole river that holds undercuts and big fish. And yes,the Humber holds a crap load of browns.

Before we send you out on ol lord Simcoe,what will you be in? Hate to give out info that you cant use. Also what are you targeting?

Done buddy. How ya been? Good luck to you.

Humber? Just down from the tennis court?

Yes,,,,,,,,,BUT WHY??????? WHO,S TO BLAME FOR THIS IGNORANCE??????

My skin is no longer thick enough to go to these rapeing areas Burt. It hasnt changed since I can remember. Sad really. I,ll bet you felt like sticking a #1 O treb in thier face and dragging them with your truck eh? Yeah, me too.

Love the colours of them browns D. TFS

LOL John Did you happen to notice the depth at the dock? Dought he gets under there. Thats a great catch there Jaden.

Yeah I knew that.just thought maybe the MNR got ahead of themselves.LOL

Anyone get thiers yet?

Those shots were not that far away Rich. You maybe right.Bad flash. No more baiting.

Charles Sims is a well known angler.