Mykester

Hey man no problem, I was having a good day.

If you haven't heard of Benediction, they're another good old school dm band.

define:heavy

husky jerk

Posting pictures of people without consent is damn creepy. You are not an officer. Call one.

Jim... Only the real, long term members knew who he was.

Ehg, please read the rules next time. Flaming/trolling is against the rules. Thanks.

My my, someone sure is insecure. Bravo, you know how to edit posts! I can see why you find copy/pasting to be a skill, ehg. Unfortunately some of us are slower than others and a simple task that involves pressing two buttons takes a lot of effort for someone of your caliber. It amazes me that you're able to use a computer. You gotta love technology!

I kind of know how you feel. We have an 18 ft trailer that we used to keep in a back parking lot, and one night some cuties bent the door, broke some rods, and threw some of the tools around.

Who doesn't like a little parody black metal?

It helps to have one on the front and one on the back so you're not going on circles.

While no statement I'm about to make should be construed as suggesting or recommending that any person commit an illegal act of any kind, you should realize that Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program engages in pietistic babble that nauseates even some of my more religious friends. Let's get down to brass tacks: There is something grievously wrong with those militant pissants who defy the law of the land. Shame on the lot of them! In general, I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's bromides have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program wants all of us to believe that everything it says is entirely and absolutely true. That's why it sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. If Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program is going to talk about higher standards, then it needs to live by those higher standards. I believe I have finally figured out what makes organizations like Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program take us over the edge of the abyss of nonrepresentationalism. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program is bad enough when it's alone, but it is even worse when it's joined by dirty nutters. Here's some news for you: The encroachment of perverted, sullen harangues into the social fabric of our politics, our institutions, and our laws would give credence to my claim that this is nothing new. Interesting, isn't it? What you may find even more interesting is that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to stop this insanity? I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to fuel inquisitions. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but it has the nerve to call those of us who summon up the courage to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when it says that it's okay if its activities initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins. Much of Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the anti-democratic batty-types whom Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program claims to be trying to help. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program stubbornly refuses to own up to its mistakes serves only to convince me that it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of wily warped-types like it can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. Be always mindful that I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why as long as I live and breathe, I will strive to purge the darkness from Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's heart. But the short answer is that it appears to have found a new tool to use to help it feature simplistic answers to complex problems. That tool is denominationalism, and if you watch it wield it, you'll unmistakably see why its apologists consider its belief systems a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of alarmism. Perhaps Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program has never had to take a stand and fight for something as critical as our right to call for proper disciplinary action against it and its legates. But its occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's promises. In fact, we can divide its ideas into three categories: humorless, mutinous, and dissolute. In hearing about Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's principles, one gets the distinct impression that Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program and its buddies are yellow-bellied dips. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis. I've heard Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program say that it is a model organization. Was that just a slip of the lip or is Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program secretly trying to introduce changes without testing them first? Apparently, even know-it-all Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program doesn't know the answer to that one. It wouldn't matter much if it did, given that it has been said that its subordinates get so hypnotized by its simplistic "good guys and bad guys" approach to history that they do not hear what Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program is really saying. I believe that to be true. I also believe that if you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. Now, I'm going to be honest here. If the only way to delegitimize Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program is for me to choke to death, then so be it. It would certainly be worth it because it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did its reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Why is it that 99 times out of 100, what it considers a fair shake, the rest of us consider a repressive, humiliating, culture-stripping experience?" First, I'll give you a very brief answer and then I'll go back and explain my answer in detail. As for the brief answer, it makes assertions that strain credulity. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that I'm not very conversant with Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that the gloss that Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's allies put on Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's opinions unfortunately does little to arraign it at the tribunal of public opinion. Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program's compeers get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program, and meeting some other twisted politicos is merely a social event. They're not even aware that if Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program continues to alter, rewrite, or ignore past events to make them consistent with its current "reality", I will decidedly be obliged to do something about it. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. I have a message for Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program. My message is that, for the good of us all, it should never create a kind of psychic pain at the very root of the modern mind. It should never even try to do such a resentful thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never", I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that I recently informed Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program that its vicegerents scorn and abjure reason. Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program said it'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, if it wants to complain, it should have an argument. It shouldn't just throw out the word "phenolsulphonephthalein", for example, and expect us to be scared. Thus, in summing up, we can establish the following: 1) Ontario's Atlantic Salmon Program makes it its job to insult my intelligence, and 2) its assertion that its mistakes are always someone else's fault serves only to illustrate its ignorance and poorly hidden bigotry.

ya dat guy wuz prety stopid lol

It will sincerely surprise some people to hear me say this, but under the label of "dishonest" are those, like OFC, who propound ideas that are widely perceived as representing outright quislingism. Here's how this thread works: I'll offer ideas and a theory to explain things. You bring your own experiences to bear on the matter of OFC's obscene remonstrations, supplementing them where necessary with information from this letter. Together we will make this world a kinder, gentler place. OFC keeps missing my point. More specifically, it keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that OFC has a problem not only with civil rights but also with the legal responsibility and accountability as to what is considered appropriate behavior, OFC seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that several things it has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of its that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how bloodthirsty tossers aren't ever dodgy. Okay, have you had enough of this thread? Good. Let's end it by reiterating that turning blusterers loose against us good citizens is considered de rigueur by OFC's peuplade.

The brush looks like hell, but it sure seemed to pay off!