Dutch01

1 hour ago, AKRISONER said:

Dont forget to super over dress under your waiters when making the switch

......and nothing with cotton.  Get a pair of Under Armor base layer pants and a thick fleece track pant.  Not something cheap from Walmart, a performance fleece from Columbia (or a cheaper comparable quality brand).  I can be out in March or November and stand in the river a long time without getting cold using that setup.

I have a pair of Streamside Guardian waders and I have been very happy with the product and the company.

I used my first pair for almost two years. I patched one hole in the foot with the included patch kit - I had bought very cheap wading boots at Canadian Tire and they wore a hole in the sock foot.  That's not really on Streamside, and they were otherwise great.  At just about two years old, they did spring a leak near the seam between the sock foot and the leg.  I called Streamside and they said they have a two year warranty and they replaced them with a newer style (that had a different seam btw) with no hassle.  Went to their place in Markham and did a straight exchange, easy-peasy.  The replacement pair is over a year old now and going strong, and I've put a fair number of  miles on them.

I think they were around 180 at Gagnon's.  I will be buying these again when my current pair needs replacing.

My main kayak fishing buddy is going on 3 weeks now in the ICU at Scarborough Centenary Hospital.  He was unfortunately against the vaccine, and has since told me via one of our few text exchanges that he wishes he had gotten it.  If they take him off oxygen his blood oxygen drops, so there's likely some damage, and no way to know if it's permanent.

I was already distancing more than most and I'm doubling that now.

Hope you get things sorted out @DRIFTER_016  

The three greatest lies ever told:

1) I will respect you in the morning

2) The cheque is in the mail

3) I'm from Canada Post and I'm here to help you

11 minutes ago, manfish said:

What do these crap conversations have with the original post???

Absolutely nothing.

20 minutes ago, Rizzo said:

...so you just ignore the part when I said ""the cases I have seen"...gotcha. If taking things out of context is all you have, there is no point discussing this. 

I did not ignore that part, it was included in my quote.  Taking it out of context would have meant removing that part of the quote.

Your point was heavy on a) this affects the old and b) why aren't we doing more about drug overdoses.

a) It affects the old and the young.  And the old aren't worth less than the young.

b) It is not binary.  We are doing a lot (and could do more) about drug overdoses.  We can do two things at once.  People dying of drug overdoses is not a reason to let COVID run rampant because lockdowns "DON'T work" according to you.  (Again, your quote and your capitals)

@scuro2has diligently and accurately argued that lockdowns do in fact work and I am in agreement.

It is easy to say what we should do when we have no education in the matter (how many epidemiologists are members of this board?) and no data to drive good decision making.  There are too many YouTube experts here.  We have Public Health departments for a reason.

You have already said you are moving to Florida because Ontario has gone insane, so you are right, "there is no point discussing this."

But here we all are, arguing politics on a fishing board with a no political posts rule...

5 minutes ago, Rizzo said:

the question was asked "who said it was ever just taking older people"

you referred to me.

I did not say that, and so I do not appreciate you implying that I did. 

Again - "only ever" is close enough to "ever just" to me.  You don't like that, okay then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

11 minutes ago, Rizzo said:

I do not appreciated being mis-quoted. I never said "it only affects the old". I said THE CASES I HAVE SEEN were older people. Never would I say it "only" affects the elderly. What happened in Brampton is a real tragedy and my heart goes out to the family. You should not twist my words to try and prove some point.

"Almost every single..." was definitive enough for me, whether you appreciate me quoting you or not.  I didn't put words in your mouth, I directly quoted you.

2 minutes ago, BillM said:

I'm going to nitpick here, but he didn't say everyone, he said almost everyone.    So say 99% out of a 100. 

You're barking up the wrong tree here, I have no interest in splitting hairs on this board.  A question was asked and answered, if you don't like the answer given feel free to disregard it.

Dutch

7 minutes ago, BillM said:

He's not wrong is he?   

I believe he is, but that was not the point of my post.  You asked "Who said it was ever just taking older people?" and I answered.

37 minutes ago, BillM said:

Who said it was ever just taking older people?  

@Rizzo "Almost every single covid death I have seen has been in people 80 and over...and almost every one of those, the family told me the person was in very poor health as it was. In other words, they were already near the end of their life. I think I have only seen one under the age of 70 (that person was 69, and also in poor health)."

On 4/22/2021 at 7:09 PM, Hack_Fisherman said:

Shouldn’t be ANY planes coming in except cargo. Business travellers should work/meet online

I am in the Logistics business (including moving air freight).  Most air freight flies on commercial passenger planes.  It's generally not economically viable for an airline to fly without one or the other.

1 hour ago, scuro2 said:

Ohh gawd, how much I would give if I was never directed to watch another damned youtube video giving me the REAL TRUTH. You can be certain after watching one that you will be misinformed.

A vaccine is a jab that protects you. We have heard all this bull before they were even given that they won't work. The proof is in the pudding and the vaccines are working WAY better then imagined. All the rest is story telling. People pretending that they know what they are talking about but they don't. It's tiresome.

You should save this for future use 

That's pretty cool actually.  I'm good for a truck for a long time but if that had been around when I was shopping it might have made a difference.

1 hour ago, Toronto_Angler said:

This statement bothers me. It's like something someone from north korea would say

Everyone in Canada obeys laws to one extent or another.  Some people speed, some don't.  Some people are obeying the stay at home order, some are not.

I'm not sure how that puts you in any position to judge crappieperchhunter for making their own choice.

While you guys are right that there is no curfew, tickets that are issued are not for "breaking curfew", they are specifically for "disobeying an order" under the declaration of emergency.  I am not saying you will get ticketed if you sleep in your hut.  I am saying it's possible and it's up to you if you take the risk or not.

They may may have given you more info than thought in that reply:

"If you do engage in fishing for a permitted purpose, you are encouraged to do so close to home, and only with other members of your household and you are there for the purpose of fishing.  You are required to remain at your place of residence otherwise."

The Italics are mine - I can see where if you get the wrong officer and they wanted to ticket you, they could interpret your purpose as sleeping and not fishing if you have a cot and sleeping bag setup, or are actually sleeping.  It's enough ambiguity that I personally won't be attempting an ice camp until and unless they lift the stay at home order.  Good luck whatever you all decide.

On 1/28/2021 at 6:31 PM, crappieperchhunter said:

I wish them a good season, I really do.  But how  are they going to be able to determine if all hut occupants are from the same household?  I'm sure that is the covid procedure laid out for them to follow. But does anyone really think it is going to be followed very closely?  

I'm booked in with them for next week to take my Son out for a day.  I was told on the phone that on arrival they will be requiring the names of everyone going in the hut, for contact tracing purposes.  That is probably at least in part to alleviate some liability by showing they did their due diligence.

They have staggered arrivals and departures, so everybody isn't there at the opening bell scrambling to be first (like it used to be!).  I chose the latest of three windows (9-930am drive out, 5-530pm pickup) 'cause my Son is a teenager and doesn't like to get up early.

I was also advised to check the home page of their website where they have all requirements listed.  I've always found them to be a pretty professional operation, so I would expect the same from them where re-opening requirements are concerned.  I guess I will find out next week!

Back on the thread topic (fishing and the stay at home order).....I have been staying off the ice so far due to a lack of clarity around ice fishing and also a few people around me starting testing positive so I kind of "hunkered down" for a few weeks.

The general consensus I see online is that ice fishing is permitted, but travel is not, although there is plenty of dissent.  This article seems to be saying you can travel to fish, you just have to travel back that day.

Just FYI, don't shoot the messenger if you have strong opinions one way or another!

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/thunder-bay/thunder-bay-opp-ice-fishing-lockdown-rules-1.5887138

 

1 hour ago, misfish said:

Yes, it,s a one man flip. I removed the bench seat and use a folding chair. Much lighter now.

I sold my Rapala Cruz M1 'cause it was too heavy, but a lot of that weight is in the bench you removed. 

@akaShag The CLAM Kenai is pretty light at 45 pounds, but its tight in there.  I sat in one at Trombly's for a long time and almost bought it (sometimes I still wish I did!)

4 minutes ago, Terry said:

Ok

 

i have had some people tell me they got tickets for snowmobiling outside there area tues and another Wednesday. I have not heard anything that is a law against travel. Has something new happened that I haven’t heard 

I spoke directly to an OPP Officer at a local detachment today.  She tried to maintain the party line ("Travel is not recommended at this time") but I boxed her in and she conceded there is no specific law against travel in Ontario at this time. 

I recommend anyone who is unsure or prefers to do their own due diligence call their local detachment.  It is a quick call and confirms what you want to know directly from the horses mouth.

Just now, misfish said:

Made. 

Nice!  You should sell them (put me down for one) LOL

On 1/4/2021 at 6:53 PM, misfish said:

This is mine 

 

Buy it or make it?

I would avoid at all costs. High heat on galvanized finish gives off toxic zinc fumes.

Another vote for Milwaukee FUEL (technically Model 2804-20).  I have mine on a clam plate 'cause I like the "auger feel" and in my personal opinion it's safer.  It's light and drills faster than my old (sold) gas auger.  The batteries have never given me trouble in the cold, and I've never come close to running one out of charge in a day.

EDIT to add that I use it with an 8" Fin Bore which cuts amazing.  I also use a 12" extension once the ice gets thick enough but for early ice it's not needed.

4 hours ago, misfish said:

That is a hell of a way to get out of ice fishing. LOL

Heal up,there will be next weekend .

Honestly I'm pretty crushed. That's such a beautiful spot (I spend time camping there in summer) and based on the long term (snow) forecast I don't think I'll make it in there again this year with a truck.

I need a sled!