Jump to content

manitoubass2

Members
  • Posts

    11,391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by manitoubass2

  1. I plow with a gator for smaller jobs, 3/4 tonne for big jobs. I like plowing, its part of my job that i really enjoy. I hand shovel the elders places for exercise. The gator is more fun for sure, doesnt even feel like work:) even funner when i put the tracks on to got explore the bush lol

  2. We the people do..Thats the point..Its run on a co-op basis you can buy sell or trade. There are a TON of seed banks run by average joes all over the planet.

     

    Start here and go from there..

    http://www.seeds.ca/en.php

    true, but my point was geared more towards the legality of there use now, and in the near future. Many people are already being sued bankrupt by laws that inhibit the use of seeds for medium sized and large scale open farming. In other words we live in a system within corporate society that is slowly, but blatantly obviously taking away our rights to bare fruit so to speak. Thus my concern for GMO anything. Patents pending and patents awarded are allowing huge corporations to control our food supply and thats just flat out dangerous. Illegal to use a seed you want to use? Seriously think about the implications of that. That in itself should be a crime, and never should happen to begin with. We dont trust the government with our tax dollars, why would we trust them with our food????
  3. Yes, but he also fails to mention that producing a lower cost higher yield does not necessarily mean you(the company/corporation) need to lower quality to provide profit. When pseudo science is used at the expense of ones health to provide these lower cost higher yield products, your demonstrating an enormous lack of morals in spite of your fellow man. Enter this into numerous facets of human needs or wants, and the result is a culling of sorts. Intentionally or unintentionally you are harming nature in inhumane ways. Really, its a flaw in thinking rationally in what benefits from these practises. Unfortunately in todays modernized world knowledge and intelligence are in an awkward "beneficial" debate. To use it as a means solely for profit? Or use it as a means to provide health and satiety? When money rules us, guess which route gets chosen more times then not.

  4. Funny you should ask about bread and asbestos. Many of the big food companies have there hands in a lot more than food now a days.lol. My line of thought is you will not stop profit no matter what you do it is the driving factor for both the consumer and the producer. If the company can produce a chicken that is cost per pound cheaper by chemical or by genetically modifying they will do it and you (meaning all consumers) are forcing them to do it. Few people would pay for a better product if they felt like they could not get someone else to pay for it. In other words take on an additional expense without knowing how it is going to be paid for. It is when a person can ignore the past statement when they become willingly debted to either a person or credit company. Now we have to look at the production side we as investors are the driving force behind less expenses with better profits to the stockholders. Without advances in production we do not have the land or capacity to feed people the old fashion way where it takes 3/4 acres to bring 1 sheep to market. Chickens raised here at our farm (faux Farm) are here for the eggs and are also free range cost.... wait for it 3 times as much per egg and 300% more room. it takes 20 chickens to keep 6 adults in casual egg use with this method. For there to be a profit to support a company of art's eggs is $11.25 per dozen.... the best I can get with this method is $5.00 a dozen from the public. The data just does not support a business model that supports mass produced organic produce.

     

     

     

    Art

    you just perfectly described how capitalism and the free market is a MASSIVE human error and exploits humanity for the sake of profit. A** backwards imo. You know art, if a person is knowledgable in "their product/practise" and does a lil leg work, consumers will come for quality. Read any of the comments in the Lund thread? Seems to me consumers are more than willing to pay extra for a superior product that performs well and exceeds safety recommendations. What makes you think producing food in a similar manner wont succeed or be profitable provided you do your best to educate, provide exceptional service and product? I get it, its more convenient to follow the new status quo of company disservice to an ignorant consumer fueled by nothing other then profit. Its no wonder our world is a complete and utter mess
  5. As soon as i hear the term "GMO", I automatically think it means generically misguided outcomes. Once science is used as a means to profit, its no longer legitimate imo. Do you think some of these conglomerate corporations perform "real science" for the benefit of mankind? Its nothing more then profit at any means necessary, not really the type of "pseudo scientist" i trust. Art, would you buy a loaf of bread from a asbestos company? I wouldnt. These arent "food" companies, they specialize in making poisonous and toxic chemicals. What a great place to get your chickens from! Half of them should be shut down for previous crimes against humanity, real talk.

  6. Food is very intertwined with health. Ill gladly pay extra for quality food, and do. Its becoming more and more available to get quality foods, and i hope it continues to grow. You see, one of many issues i have with genetically modifying food is that we have little data on safety at this point, the whole world is just kinda winging it and "hey, lets see what happens". Ive seen this in other areas of our life and unless your privy to "real" double blind placebo trials that are NOT funded by those that profit from a favourable outcome, you really have no idea, nor do i. When i studied to be a nutritional consultant practitioner, and organic chemistry etc, my eyes were opened to some really strange outcomes of science, that the general public would have no idea was even happening. A quick example would be vitamin e. ask ten people what they think of vitamin e, and all ten will probably say "yeah, that a healthy vitamin". A few might say " oh yeah thats an anti oxidant, good to combat illness and disease". But i guarantee not one of them says " vitamin e is a great anti oxidant for general health and well being, but it must be natural tocopherol and not synthetic, because the synthetic version is mirrored, and thus backwords. The body doesnt recognize "backwards vitamin e" and it might actually stimulate an immune response not favourable to human health"

  7. kadri's a baby.

     

    he'll get what is coming to him.

     

    he's quickly being known as a cheap shot artist in the NHL.

     

    that started with kadri giving a cheap shot from behind, then kadri sticked the guy ... i don't like the crap he does.

     

    someone's going to knock him out .... he'll deserve it ... and hopefully grows up after it.

    no worse than crosby, and he seems to be doing just fine. If he slashes etc and gets called out on it in a fight and hes willing to exchange punches, whats the problem??? I like that style of hockey, especially in a player that can set up and score. Pissing people off changes their game. Its smart imo, just dont cross the line and intend to injure
×
×
  • Create New...