data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a20dc/a20dc485633c3771697fd01abb89b7d3042b1548" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f638/8f6386f90af6d2f1635321d64eba1951ef441c3e" alt=""
Acountdeleted
-
Posts
2,562 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Acountdeleted's Achievements
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cfe7/1cfe759079cc8539ce7f345e018caa443675d183" alt="Rank: All Knowing Angler (8/10) All Knowing Angler"
All Knowing Angler (8/10)
52
Reputation
Single Status Update
See all updates by Acountdeleted
-
Had a good look at the Kawartha's regs today. Walleye: S-4, C-1..... How does that make sense? Shouldn't it be S-2?
- Show previous comments 4 more
-
They probably wanted ZERO, but left it as one in case you foul hook one so you can take it home.
-
That's what I mean though. I feel like with S4 C1 it looks more like a cash grab then an actual conservation effort. It's essentially saying 'spend an extra $30 a year and keep 3 more fish a day' rather then 'we are trying to give the walleye time to recover'
-
how do you get $30 more? the conservation cost is $16.75 and sports is $29.46.
regardless it is strange