bigugli Posted February 22, 2016 Report Share Posted February 22, 2016 yes that is their job, however, they are allowed to distribute tickets and charges at their own discretion, otherwise people would never get away with a warning for a speeding ticket. A traffic ticket is not a criminal offence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave524 Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 If they didn't want to charge him, they shouldn't have had him blow, once he did, their hands would be pretty well tied . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirCranksalot Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 It was a 'story' in the Sun----any resemblance to the truth is purely coincidental!! . No sense trying determine right vs. wrong, good judgement vs. bad based on a Sun report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adempsey Posted February 23, 2016 Report Share Posted February 23, 2016 Impaired after the accident == impaired before the accident. Probably covering their bases for whatever happens going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloatnFly Posted February 24, 2016 Report Share Posted February 24, 2016 It was a 'story' in the Sun----any resemblance to the truth is purely coincidental!! . No sense trying determine right vs. wrong, good judgement vs. bad based on a Sun report. Barrie Examiner http://www.thebarrieexaminer.com/2016/02/06/innisfil-man-charged-in-death-of-snowmobiler-after-machine-went-through-the-ice CBC: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/georgian-bay-ice-snowmobile-1.3437057 not just a story in the 'Sun' police know that after the first sled went through, the operator of the second sled got off to help and went through and died. the last guy remaining did the right thing, tried to help his friends. This is clearly an emergency situation, and I will expect all charges will dropped. did they test the other? or just the driver with a dead friend and 2 frozen ones on the back of a single sled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Bacon Posted February 24, 2016 Report Share Posted February 24, 2016 Impaired after the accident == impaired before the accident. True, but driving after the accident does not equal driving before the accident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted February 24, 2016 Report Share Posted February 24, 2016 I bet the charges stick. Cops are really sticky when it comes to drinking and operating a motor vehicle.... I hope they drop them...but I doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kawartha Kev Posted February 26, 2016 Report Share Posted February 26, 2016 It appears the charges have been dropped http://www.torontosun.com/2016/02/26/hero-fishermans-impaired-driving-charge-dropped Kawartha Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
misfish Posted February 27, 2016 Report Share Posted February 27, 2016 (edited) Me bad Double posted Edited February 27, 2016 by Brian B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manitoubass2 Posted February 28, 2016 Report Share Posted February 28, 2016 A little shocked but if the evidence/intent panned out, great call! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now